PICC导管相关性感染的危险因素分析.pdf

《PICC导管相关性感染的危险因素分析.pdf》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在应用文档-天天文库。

1、全科护理2014年8月第12卷第24期(总第333期)·2213·PICC导管相关性感染的危险因素分析AnalysisonriskfactorsofPICOcatheterrelatedlnfections王玉WangYu(FifthHospitalofWuhanCityHubeiProvince，Hubei430050China)摘要：[目的]探讨经外周静脉置入中AbstractObjective：ToprobeintotheriskfactorsofPICCcatheter—re—心静脉导管(PICC)相关性感染的危险lated

2、infectionsandimprovetheclinicalmedica1security．Methods：Ato—因素，以利提高，1盏床医疗安全性。[方ta1of353PICCpatientswithcompletedatawerecollectedandtheywere法]纳入资料完整的PICC导管置入病dividedintoinfectiongroup(30cases)andnot—infectiongroup(323ca—人353例，以是否发生导管相关性感ses)accordingtowhethercatheter—rel

3、atedinfectionsoccurredornot．染为判断标准分为感染组3O例和非Singlefactoranalysiswasusedtoinvestigatedifferencesinriskfactorsof感染组323例。采用单因素分析两组间导管相关性感染的危险因素的差catheter—relatedinfections，andfurtherLogisticregressionanalysiswas异，并进一步通过Logistic回归分析影usedtoinvestigatetheindependentriskfacto

4、rofcatheter—relatedinfec—响导管相关性感染发生的独立危险因tions．Results：Twogroupsofsinglefactoranalysisshowedthatpatients素。[结果]两组资料单因素分析表ininfectiongrouphadoldageandlongtubetime，theratioofdiabetes明，感染组年龄大、留置时间长、糖尿history，applicationhormone，puncture≥2ormoretimes，guidedbyultra—病史、应用激素、穿刺

5、≥2次、超声引导soundandoperatorexperience<50timeswerehigherthanthatinnon—及操作人员经验<5O次比例均高于非infectiongroupandalldifferenceswerestatisticalsignificance(aIlP<0．05)．感染组，差异均有统计学意义(均P

6、ongroup。andthedifferencewasstatistica1significance(P

7、ngroupwerehigherthanthose于非感染组，差异均有统计学意义(均innon—infectiongroup(P

8、次是发生导管相关catheter—relatedinfections．感染的独立危险因素。关键词：经外周静脉置入中心静脉导KeywordsPeripherallyInsertedCentralCatheter，PICC；infecti