2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation

2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation

ID:40553812

大小:157.00 KB

页数:21页

时间:2019-08-04

2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation_第1页
2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation_第2页
2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation_第3页
2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation_第4页
2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation_第5页
资源描述:

《2006 The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、ReviewofIndustrialOrganization(2006)29:127–147©Springer2006DOI10.1007/s11151-006-9112-xTheRoleofCompetitioninNaturalMonopoly:Costs,PublicOwnership,andRegulationJOHNE.KWOKA∗DepartmentofEconomics,NortheasternUniversity,301LakeHall,Boston,MA02115,USAAbstract.Conventionalpolicyforindustrieswithver

2、yhigheconomiesofscaleistoper-mitmonopolybuttosubjectittoregulationorpublicownership.Sincethelattermaynotresultincostminimization,however,itispossiblethatcompetition,byforcingfirmstooperateatthecostfrontier,maybelesscostlydespitesacrificingsomescaleecono-mies.Thepapersetsouttherelevantanalyticalc

3、onsiderations,estimatesacostfunctionforelectricdistributionutilitiesintheU.S.,andtestsfortherelativecostsofmonopolyandduopolyutilities.Amongothernotablefindings,itconcludesthatcompetitiondoesindeedlowernetcosts.Keywords:Benchmarkcompetition,electricutilities,publicownership,regulation.I.Introdu

4、ctionAlthoughtherelationshipbetweencompetitionandpricereceivesmoreattention,theeffectofcompetitiononcostsmaybeatleastasimpor-tant.Bysomemeasurestheefficienciesgainedfromthelatterexceedal-locativeimprovementsduetopricecompetition(SchererandRoss,1990,p.672),andinanyevent,costreductionsareonereaso

5、nforpricedeclines.Allthismakescostcompetitionseemuniversallyadvantageous,butwhereproductiontechnologyischaracterizedbysignificanteconomiesofscale,classicalcompetitioninvolvingmultiplefirmswouldseemtobeanunprom-isingapproach:Competitionmayforcefirmstominimizecostforagivenoutputandthusoperateatthec

6、ostfrontier,buteachfirmproduceslessoutput,failstoachieveminimumefficientscale,andsuffersexcessunitcost.Forthisreason,thepreservationofmultiplefirmsofsuboptimalscaleisscarcelyeverendorsedasgoodpolicy.Thatconclusionmaybetoofacile,however,fortworeasons.First,thetrade-offbetweenacloserapproximationto

7、thecostfrontierandthe∗Authorforcorrespondence:Tel.:617-373-2252;Fax:617-373-3640;E-mail:j.kwoka@neu.edu128JOHNE.KWOKAsacrificeofscaleeconomiesisanempiricalquestion,andnotonethatnecessarilyfavorsthefull-scalemonopolyfirmwithitsexcesscosts.

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。