recent developments in organizational sociology 4200832

《recent developments in organizational sociology 4200832》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

RecentDevelopmentsin:OrganizationalSociologyAuthor(s):W.RichardScottSource:ActaSociologica,Vol.36,No.1(1993),pp.63-68Publishedby:SagePublications,Ltd.StableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4200832.Accessed:12/12/201323:31YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceoftheTerms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org..SagePublications,Ltd.iscollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoActaSociologica.http://www.jstor.orgThiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions ActaSociologica(1993)36:63-68REcENTDEVELOPMENTSINOrganizationalSociologyW.RichardScottDepartmentofSociology,StanfordUniversityParadigmwarsengagedinsimilarfunctions-andstressedtheinabilityofindividualorganizationstoAftermorethantwodecadesofturbulentadaptrapidlytochangingenvironments,change-roughly,theperiod1965-1985-withtheresultthatoneformwassucceededthefieldoforganizationalstudieshasbyanother(Hannan&Freeman1977;Ald-becomesomewhatlessvolatile.Forarich1979).Transactionscostseconomistsperiodofmorethantwentyyears,andwitharguedthatorganizationsattempttolocateincreasingspeed,oneafteranothertheor-theirboundariessoastoreducethecostseticalparadigmchallengedexistingknowl-ofnegotiatingandenforcingexchangeedgeandwas,inturn,itselfchallenged.agreementswithcriticalpartners(Wil-T1hefirstmajornewformulationpositingliamson1975,1985).Criticaltheoristschal-thatorganizationsstructuresweredesignedlengedtheassumptionthatorganizationalsoastobestadapttovaryingenviron-systemsweredesignedtoenhanceef-ments-thecontingencyapproach-ficiency,arguingthatthedivisionoflaborappearedin1967.Thompson's(1967)inter-reflectstheoutcomeofstrugglesbetweenrelatedpropositionstogetherwithLaw-thoseperformingandthoseoverseeingtherenceandLorsch's(1967)illustrativecaseworkandthathierarchicalstructuresarestudiesprovidedanimportantbaselinethe-betterexplainedasameanstopreserveoryrecognizingthecentralityofenviron-inequalityandpowerratherthanasamech-mentalforcesinshapingorganizationalanismof:oordinationandrationalman-structures.Latertheoreticaldevelopmentsagement(Braverman1974;Edwards1979).havenotunderminedthestrengthofthisAndinstitutionaltheoristsbroadenedtheopen-systemsconceptionbutratherhaveagendatoexaminecultural-normativeandredefinedtheparametersofenvironments,cognitive-processesproducinghomogen-pushingthemupandout:'up'inthesenseeityofformswithinan'organizationfield'-ofelevatingthelevelofanalysisfromfocus-diverseorganizationsinteractingwithinaingonasingleorganizationanditsimmedi-broadsocietaldomain(Meyer&Rowanatecontexttoexaminingvaryingcollections1977;DiMaggio&Powell1983;Powell&oforganizations;and'out'inwideningtheDiMaggio1991).rangeofenvironmentalfactorstakenintoaccount.Thus,resourcedependencyshiftedatten-Comparingandcombiningtiontothe'organizationset'-acollec-perspectivestionoforganizationsexchangingvitalThesediverseandconflictingparadigmsresources-andemphasizedtheuseofpol-cametumblingintotheformerlyplaciditicalstrategies,e.g.co-optationandarenaoforganizationstudiesinrapidsuc-coalitions,asasolutiontoeconomicprob-cession-toorapidlytobeproperlyevalu-lemssuchasdependencyanduncertaintyatedorreconciled(fordetailedreviews,see(Pfeffer1972;Pfeffer&Salancik1978).Grandori1987;Perrow1986;Pfeffer1982;Populationecologyfocusedonentirepopu-Scott1992).Fortunatelyforthosewishinglationsoforganizations-similarformstotakestockandreduceincoherence,the?ScandinavianSociologicalAssociation,1993recentperiodhaswitnessedaslackeningof63Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions creativityandincreasedattentiontosyn-Inanimportantcontribution,Fligsteinthesis.(1990)attemptstoconstructasociologicalThemostimportantworkoftheperiodanalysisofthechangingstructuresandper-since1985includesanumberofmajorformanceofUScorporationsduringtheeffortstocombineorreconcileprevious20thcentury.Fligsteindrawstogetherconflictingparadigms.Intheirvolumesum-elementsfromresourcedependencyandmarizingnewdevelopmentsinecologicalinstitutionaltheoryinordertochallengetheoryandreviewingadecadeofempiricalmoreconventional,efficiency-orientedresearch,HannanandFreeman(1989)accountsofchangesincorporatestrategyattempttodevelopconnectionsbetweenandstructure(e.g.Chandler1962,1977;ecologicalandinstitutionaltheory.AkeyWilliamson1975).Marketsareviewedasproblemconfrontingthestudentoforgan-beingsociallyconstructedbytheactionsizationalpopulationsishowtodistinguishofdominantfirmsunderconstraintsonepopulationfromanother.HannanandimposedbytheregulatoryactivitiesoftheFreeman'searlyargumentsfocusedoncorenation-state.Fligsteinarguesthatcontroltechnologies,buttheirlaterviewsstressstrategiescharacterizingcorporatefieldstheimportanceofinstitutionalprocesses-haveevolvedfromanearlyemphasisonbeliefsystemsregardingthelegitimacyanddirectcontrolofcompetitionthroughtaken-for-grantednessoforganizationalmanufacturingcontrolsandmarketingcon-forms-thatleadtoeithermoresegregatedtrolstoacurrentemphasisonfinancialcon-ormoreblendedviewsofforms.Theycon-trols.Theseargumentsareevaluatedclude:employinganalysesofadatasetcontainingtheclarityofasetofboundariesisnotainformationonthe100largestUSfirmspermanentpropertyofasetofclassifications.atintervalsextendingfrom1919throughRather,therealismofdistinctionamongforms1979.dependsonthedegreeofinstitutionalizationInsomeways,Stinchcombe's(1990)thathasoccurred.(Hannan&Freeman1989:treatiseonInformationandOrganizations57)harkensbacktocontingencytheory'sbasicAnevenstrongerlinkagebetweenthetwoassumptionthatorganizationsdesigntheirtheoriesismadewhenHannanandFree-structuressoastodealwithuncertaintymanrevisetheirinterpretationoffindingsandhencethatorganizations'growtheirassociatedwiththeirempiricalstudiesofstructures'towardrelevantsourcesofinfor-populationdensity.Theirearlyworkmation.Also,likeLawrenceandLorsch,focusedondensityasanindicatorofcom-Stinchcombeinsiststhatdifferentpartsofpetitionbetweenorganizationalforms,not-theorganizationdealwithdiversesourcesingthathighdensitywasassociatedwithofuncertaintyandconsequentlymustde-increasingcompetitionand,hence,popu-velopdifferingstructuresandrationalities.lationstabilityorevendecline.MoreThevaryingrequirementsimposedonrecentlytheysuggestthattheearlystagesorganizationsbyinformationprocessingofpopulationgrowthsignifytheincreasinggiverisetodiversetypesoftechnicalcoreslegitimacyoftheform,thusaccountingfor(e.g.productionsystems),differinginanexcessofbirthsoverdeaths.Thisargu-wherediscretionissited.Indiscussinghowment,elaboratedandexploredinHannanorganizationsestablishandmodifytheirandCarroll(1992),hasnocounterpartinboundaries,Stinchcombeincorporatesclassicalecologicaltheoriesbutrathertransactionscostsargumentsindiscussingdrawsforitsinsightdirectlyoninstitutionalconditionsgivingrisetoverticalintegra-theory.Whilethereremainscontroversytion.However,hemodifiesandcon-overthisinterpretation(seeZucker1989),ditionalizestheseargumentstotakeanincreasingnumberoforganizationalaccountofthecostsandlimitationsofown-researchershavefruitfullycombinedinsti-ershipasacontrolstrategy,notingthattutionalandecologicalargumentsinothermechanismscombiningselectedaccountingforpopulationdynamics(see,aspectsofhierarchywithcontractslinkinge.g.,Carroll&Huo1986;Singh,Tucker&independentorganizationsareoftenpref-House1986).erable.64Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions Therelationbetweentechnologyandturesaredependentfortheirviabilityandstructureisatopiclongstudiedbystudentseffectivenessonthesupportavailablefromoforganizations,butrecentdevelopmentsthewiderenvironment,includingthebusi-focusontheorganizationalconsequencesnesscommunityandthenation-state.oftechnologicalbreakthroughs.SuchLastly,animportantstudybyLincolneffectsplaythemselvesoutnotonlyattheandKalleberg(1990)employsarichdata-levelofindividualorganizationsbutatthebasetocontrastworkercommitmentandindustryororganizationalpopulationlevel.satisfactionandworkstructuresinmanu-Schumpeter(1961)firstcalledattentiontofacturingorganizationsintheUSandthe'galesofcreativedestruction'-notingJapan.Arepresentativesampleofem-thelinkagesamongthedevelopmentofnewployeesandmanagerswasdrawnfromtechnologies,thedemiseofexistingorgan-fifty-fiveAmericancompaniesandfifty-oneizationsandtheemergenceofnewforms.Japanesecompanies,stratifiedbysize,andRecentresearchconductedbyTushmanlocatedincentralregionsofeachcountry.andassociatesprovidesempiricalsupportTheauthorsevaluatevariationsinstruc-fortheargumentthattechnologicalpro-turalarrangementsbyindustryaswellasgressoccursina'punctuated'fashion,bycountry,andemphasizetheimportanceincrementalimprovementsoverlongofembeddingsuchanalysesintheirbroaderperiodsbeinginterruptedbymajorprocessculturalandinstitutionalcontext.Inaorproductinnovations.Majortechno-thoughtfulrelatedarticle,Lincoln(1990)logicalshiftscanbeclassifiedaseitherdiscusseshowhehasattemptedtocombine'competencedestroying'or'competenceinsightsfromtheresource-dependence,enhancing'dependingonwhethertheyecological,transactionscostsandinsti-undermineorbuildonexistingpractices.tutionalperspectivesinexplainingdif-Thesestudiesdemonstratethatcom-ferences(andsimilarities)betweenpetence-destroyingbreakthroughsareJapaneseandUSorganizations.morelikelytogiverisetonewtypesoforganizations,oftentonewindustriesNewinitiatives(Tushman&Romanelli,1985;Tushman&Anderson1986;Anderson&TushmanWhiletheoreticalinnovationhasslowedin1990).Studyingtheevolutionoforgan-recentyears,thatisnottosaythatthereizationalformsand,inparticular,thearenonewdevelopments.Icallattentionemergenceofnewtypesoforganizationsistotwonewbroadintellectualinitiativesthatanimportantnewconcernoforganizationareaffectingtheoryandresearchonorgan-theorists(VandeVen&Garud1989;Singhizations.1990).NetworkapproachesasasetofanalyticTwofinalexamplesofrecentworkdraw-methodshaveexistedforseveraldecadesingfrommultipleperspectivesalsosignifybuthaveonlyrecentlybeenfruitfullyagrowinginterestincomparativestudies.employedinthestudyofinter-organ-Whilethereareimportantexceptions(e.g.izationalsystems.Path-breakingandDore1973;Lammers&Hickson1979;informativestudieshavebeenconductedMaurice,Sorge&Warner1980),littlebyLaumannandKnoke(1987),whoexam-attentionwasdevotedtocross-societalinedorganization-issuecomplexesactiveinstudiesoforganizationsintheearlierdefiningUSpublicpoliciesinthearenasofperiod.ArecentinterestingstudybyColeenergyandhealthcare,andbyBurt(1983),(1989)examinesfactorsassociatedwiththewhohasexaminedtheeffectsofvaryingadoptionanddiffusionofpracticessup-degreesofmarketconcentrationontheportingsmallgroupactivities(e.g.qualitydevelopmentofinterlockingdirectoratesascontrolcircles)involvingemployeesofbusi-astrategyforeffectingmarketcontrol.nessorganizations.ColecontraststheNetworksarenotonlyinevidenceasadivergentstimuli,structuralsupportsandsourceofpowerfulnewanalyticmethods;meaningsoftheseactivitiesastheyevolvedtheyincreasinglyserveasafocusfornewinJapan,SwedenandtheUS.Heshowstheoreticalarguments.Inthelatterusage,theextenttowhichthese'internal'struc-networkscallattentiontotheimportance65Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions ofaclassofsocialsystemscharacterizedcomponentsandinterestswithinorgan-byintermediatelevelsofformalizationandizationsandchallengetheassumptionthatstability.Insomecases,thesesystems'rationality'requiresthesuppressionofinvolverelativelyreliableformsofcoop-thesemanyvoicesintheserviceofunityerationamongformallyindependentorgan-orefficiency.Flexibilityandfreedomareizationsthatcollaborateindesign,celebrated,bothasaprincipleofinternalmanufacturingormarketingactivitiesdesignandasastrategyfordeployingand(Piore&Sabel1984;HAkansson1987).Indispensingwithexternalalliances(networkothers,participantsfromseveralorgan-forms).Andanalystsareenjoinedtorenderizationscometogethertoformtemporarytransparentstructurescreatedto'hidethesystemsorganizedaroundacommonobjec-contradictionsattheheartofhumanexist-tive,suchasthe'deals'thatarestruckence'(Cooper&Burrell1988:100).amonginvestmentbrokers,banksandfirmsMoreprovocativearethechallengesseekingcapital(Eccles&Crane1988).Andposedbypost-modernisttheoriststoposi-instillothers,anexistingnetworkoftivistapproachestosocialscienceknowl-relationsservingonepurposeisactivatedto*edge.Whether'interpretation'istobesub-serveanother,aswhenfamilyandkinshipstitutedfor'explanation'whether'thick'structuresareusedtopursuebusinessandcontextualizeddescriptionsaretoobjectives(Biggart1989).replacethesearchforuniversalgener-Althoughearlydiscussionssuggestedalizations;whethersocialscienceisgoingthatnetworksareappropriatelyviewedastoturnincreasinglyforitsmodelstohistoryformsintermediatealongacontinuumandthehumanities-thesearetheverybetweenmarketsandhierarchies,morelargequestionsraisedbythisnewgen-recentviewssuggestthatnetworksarebet-erationofscholars.terviewedasadistinctivearrangementwiththeirownfeaturesandlogic(Powell1990).Finally,asisthecaseinmanyarenasofsocialscience,post-modemtheoryhasReferencesbeguntomakeinroadsinorganizationalAldrich,H.E.1979.OrganizationsandEnviron-analysis(Cooper&Burrell1988;Rosenaumenu,EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.1992).Ofcourse,theproliferationofAnderson,P.&Tushman,M.1990.Tcchno-logicalDiscontinuitiesandDominantDesigns:specialized,purposefulorganizationscanACyclicalModelofTechnologicalChange,beviewedasoneofthemajorcreaturesAdministrativeScienceQuarterly35,604-633.andcarriersofthemodernizationproject.Biggart,N.W.1989.CharismaticCapitalism:Thepost-moderncritiqueoverlapssome-DirectSellingOrganizationsinAmerica.Chi-whatwiththemesalreadyapparentincago:UniversityofChicagoPress.recentstrandsoforganizationtheory:likeBraverman,H.1974.LaborandMonopolyCapi-resource-dependency,itemphasizesthetal:TheDegradationofWorkintheTwentiethcentralroleofpowerinshapingsocialinsti-Century,NewYork:MonthlyReviewPress.tutions;likecriticaltheory,itdoesnotBurt,R.S.1983.CorporateProfitsandCoopta-tion.NewYork:AcademicPress.acceptatfacevaluetherationalistclaimsCarroll,G.R.&Huo.Y.P.1986.Organ-oforganizationalapologists;and,likeinsti-izationalTaskandInstitutionalEnvironmentstutionaltheory,itstressestheoverridinginEvolutionaryPerspective:FindingsfromtheimportanceofculturalbeliefsandsymbolicLocalNewspaperIndustry,AmericanJournalprocesses.Butitscritiqueismorefar-reach-ofSociology91,838-873.ingthananyoftheseprecursors.Chandler,A.D.,Jr.1962.StrategyandStructure:BuildingontheinsightsofsuchsocialChaptersintheHistoryoftheAmericanIndus-theoristsasDerrida(1976),Foucault(1977)trialEnterprise.Cambridge,MA:MITPress.andLyotard(1984),analystssuchasChandler,A.D.,Jr.1977.TheVisibleHand:TheManagerialRevolutioninAmericanBusiness.CooperandBurrell(1988),Clegg(1990)Cambridge,MA:BelknapPressofHarvardandSmircichandCalas(1987)areUniversityPress.attemptingtoexploretheirimplicationsforClegg,S.R.1990.ModernOrganizations:understandingorganizations.Todate,prin-OrganizationStudiesinthePostmodernWorld.cipalargumentsfocusonthediversityofLondon:Sage.66Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions Cole,R.E.1989.StrategiesforLearning:Small-Behavior,Vol.13,pp.289-312,Greenwich,GroupActivitiesinAmerican,Japanese,andCT:JAIPress.SwedishIndustry.Berkeley,CA:UniversityLincoln,J.R.&Kalleberg,A.L.1990.Culture,ofCalifomiaPress.ControlandCommitment:AStudyofWorkCooper,R.&Burrell,G.1988.Modernism,OrganizationandWorkAttitudesintheUnitedPostmodernismandOrganizationalAnalysis:StatesandJapan.NewYork:CambridgeUni-AnIntroduction.OrganizationStudies9,91-versityPress.112.Lyotard,J.-F.1984.ThePostmodernConditions:Derrida,J.1976.OfGrammatology,Transi.G.AReportonKnowledge.Transl.GeoffSpivak.Baltimore,MD:JohnsHopkinsUni-BenningtonandBrianMassouri.Minneapolis,versityPress.MN:UniversityofMinnesotaPress.DiMaggio,P.J.&Powell,W.W.1983.TheIronMaurice,M.,Sorge,A.&Warner,M.1980.CageRevisited:InstitutionalIsomorphismandSocietalDifferencesinOrganizingManu-CollectiveRationalityinOrganizationalfacturingUnits:AComparisonofFrance.Fields.AmericanSociologicalReview48,147-WestGermany,andGreatBnrtain.Organ-160.izationStudies1,59-86.Dore,R.1973.BritishFactory-JapaneseMeyer,J.W.&Rowan,B.1977.Insti-Factory.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCali-tutionalizedOrganizations:FormalStructureforniaPress.asMythandCeremony.AmericanJournalofEccles,R.G.&Crane,D.B.1988.DoingDeals:Sociology83,340-363.InvestmentBanksatWork.Boston:HarvardPerrow,C.1986.ComplexOrganizations:ABusinessSchoolPress.CriticalEssay.3rded.Glenview,IL:Scott,Fligstein,N.1990.TheTransformationofCor-Foresman.porateControl.Cambridge,MA:HarvardPfeffer,J.1972.MergerasaResponsetoOrgan-UniversityPress.izationalInterdependence.AdministrativeFoucault,M.1977.DisciplineandPunish.NewScienceQuarterly17,382-392.York:Pantheon.Pfeffer,J.1982.OrganizationsandOrganizationGrandori,A.1987.PerspectivesonOrganizationTheory.Boston:Pitman.Theory.Cambridge,MA:Ballinger.Pfeffer,J.&Salancik,G.R.1978.TheExternalHakansson,H.(ed.).1987.IndustrialTech-ControlofOrganizations.NewYork:HarpernologicalDevelopment:ANetworkApproach.&Row.London:CroomHelm.Piore,M.J.&Sabel,C.F.1984.TheSecondHannan,M.T.&Carroll,G.R.1992.DynamicsIndustrialDivide:PossibilitiesforProsperity.ofOrganizationalPopulations:Density,Legi-NewYork:BasicBooks.timationandCompetition.NewYork:OxfordPowell,W.W.1990.NeitherMarketnorHier-UniversityPress.archy:NetworkFormsofOrganizations.InB.Hannan,M.T.&Freeman,J.1977.ThePopu-M.Staw&L.L.Cummings(eds.),ResearchlationEcologyofOrganizations.AmericaninOrganizationBehavior,Vol.12,pp.295-JournalofSociology82,929-964.336.Greenwich,CT:JAIPress.Hannan,M.T.&Freeman,J.1989.Organ-Powell,W.W.&DiMaggio,P.J.(eds.).1991.izationalEcology.Cambridge,MA:HarvardTheNewInstitutionalisminOrganizationalUniversityPress.Analysis.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoLammers,C.J.&Hickson,D.J.(eds.).1979.Press.OrganizationsAlikeandUnlike:InternationalRosenau,P.Marie.1992.Post-ModernismandandInterinstitutionalStudiesintheSociologyoftheSocialSciences:Insights,Inroads,andOrganiZations.London:Routledge&KeganIntrusions.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUni-Paul.versityPress.Laumann,E.0.&Knoke,D.1987.TheOrgan-Scott,W.R.1992.Organizations:Rational,Nat-izationalState:SocialChoiceinNationalPolicyuralandOpenSysters.3rded.EnglewoodDomains.Madison,WI:UniversityofWis-Cliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.consinPress.Schumpeter.J.1961.HistoryofEconomicLawrence,P.R.&Lorsch,J.W.1967.Organ-Analysis.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.izationandEnvironment:ManagingDif-Singh,J.V.(ed.).1990.OrganizationalEvol-ferentiationandIntegration.Boston:Graduateution:NewDirections.NewburyPark.CA:SchoolofBusinessAdministration,HarvardSage.University.Singh.J.V.,Tucker,D.J.&House.R.J.1986.Lincoln,J.R.1990.JapaneseOrganizationandOrganizationalLegitimacyandtheLiabilityOrganizationTheory.InB.NM.Staw&L.L.ofNewness.AdministrativeScienceQuarterlyCummings(eds.),ResearchinOrganization31,171-193.67Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions Smircich,L.&Calas,M.B.1987.OrganizationizationalBehavior,Vol.7,pp.171-222.Culture:ACriticalAssessment.InF.M.Greenwich,CT:JAIPress.Jablin,L.L.Putnam,K.H.Roberts&L.VandeVen,A.H.&Garud,R.1989.AFrame-W.Porter(eds.),HandbookofOrganizationalworkforUnderstandingtheEmergenceofConmmunication,pp.228-263.NewburyNewIndustries.InR.S.Rosenbloom(ed.),Park,CA:Sage.ResearchonTechnologicalInnovationinMan-Thompson,J.D.1967.OrganizationsinAction.agementandPolicy,Vol.4,pp.195-225.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.Greenwich,CT:JAIPress.Tushman,M.L.&Anderson,P.1986.Tech-Williamson,0.E.1975.MarketsandnologicalDiscontinuitiesandOrganizationalHierarchies:AnalysisandAntitrustImpli-Environments.AdministrativeScienceQuar-cations.NewYork:FreePress.terly31,439-465.Williamson,0.E.1985.TheEconomicInsti-Tushman,M.L.&Romanelli,E.1985.Organ-tutionsofCapitalism.NewYork:FreePress.izationalEvolution:AMetamorphosisModelZucker,L.G.1989.NoLegitimacy,NoHistory:ofConvergenceandReorientation.InB.StawCommentonCarrollandHannan,American&L.L.Cummings(eds.),ResearchinOrgan-SociologicalReview54,542-545.tiewHleftreGviewNLR190-THECLAIMSOFEQUALITYFORTHCOMING_[mPIERREB0URDWEUITERRYEAGETOG.A.COHENJUUANSTALLABRASSTheFutureofaDisillusionSnapshotsofPragueandSyNCblicPeCCrandldeeLoIM~~~BAMCABECCALUBerlinPAULCAMMACKTliIralianWomewsMosvmwetBrazil:OldPolitics,TERRYBLOOMFIELDSTUARTHALLNewForcesRockAgainsttheCar,rIdentityTONYBENNCommoditySubscribenowandreceivethisTheMenaceoftheSecretVICTORKIERNAN144-paeissueFREE,20%discountonallVersobooks;NLRbackissuesStateMarxandtheatareducedrate.ROGERTAYLORUndiscoveredCountryANNUALSUBtSCRPTION(6issues)IndividualsUK22.50;SurvivingtheThatcherDIMITRISKYRTATASOverscasX26/US$421CanS50;YearsRevelationRevisedAirmail34/USS54/Can$65.SendeitherchequepayabletoNeuEUZABETHWILSONBRANKAMAGASLeftReviU'orcreditcardtype,FeminismwithoutIllusions?CommentonGellnernumberandexpirydate(Visa/SSebicri/dion.Arcriptiost.&resr:address:Access/Mastercard/EurocardlAmEx~~~accepted).eNeuwLeftReview.120-126LaveniderAvenme.Mitcham.OrringurCREDITCARDSurreyCR43HP.UKHOTUNEnow:(0181681030168Thiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201323:31:22PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions