从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦

《从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。

1、四川大学本科毕业论文从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦AStudyonDreamsthroughWutheringHeightsfromthePerspectiveofSymbolicRhetoricABSTRACTEmilyBrontëanticipatedandincorporatedintoWutheringHeightsmanyoftheconceptsassociatedwithFreudiandreamanalysis.HerliterarydepictionofLockwood’sdreamsofCathyonthemoorsandJab

2、esBranderham,respectivelyestablishesathematiccynosureforthenovelthatallowsforadifferentpointofdepartureindiscussingthesignificanceoftheCathy-Heathcliffrelationship.Ihopetobeabletoexamineanddiscussthesequenceofdreams,albeitliterarydreamsfromthepointofviewofthesignificanceofw

3、hatFreudwouldtermthelatentdreamcontentofthetwodreamsandthenextendthatmeaningtoabroaddiscussionofwhatsheaccomplishedinthenovel.KeyWords:Freudiandream；sequenceofdreams；albeitliterarydreams四川大学本科毕业论文从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦（专业名词)学生姓名指导老师姓名摘要EmilyBrontë预期收入到呼啸山庄许多与弗洛伊德梦的分析的相关概念

4、。她的文学描写凯西摩尔和杰姆的梦想，分别建立了新的允许在讨论梦修辞的关系意义不同的出发点，主题中心。我希望能够研究和讨论梦想的顺序，尽管从佛洛伊德所说的两个梦想的潜在梦境内容的意义来看，文学的梦想，然后延伸的意义，她在小说中完成了广泛的讨论。关键词：弗洛伊德梦；梦序列；文学梦四川大学本科毕业论文从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦ContentsIntroduction5四川大学本科毕业论文从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦Thesemioticrhetoric51.TheRhetoricofDreamsinWutheringheights.21.1Twokind

5、sofDream:NaïveDreamandComplexDream.31.2RhetoricofDreamsandSymbolicRhetoric71.3Simile,Metaphor,Synecdoche,Metonymy,andIronyinDreams112.TwoQuestions152.1AClassicalSimileMaterial：TheBible152.2DreamUseSynecdochebyPuttingOne’sLifeonOthers163.MetaphorandMetonymyintheSecondDream17

6、4.Conclusion18References19四川大学本科毕业论文从符号修辞看呼啸山庄的梦IntroductionThesemioticrhetoricDreamisakindoftextofthesubconscious,whichrunsthroughtherhetoric.Asthemainwayofexpression,therhetoricofdreamnarrationisthesymbolrhetoricinthenarrativeofdream.Thedreamofthenarratorusingavarietyofrh

7、etoricaldevices,thepurposeistomoreeffectivelyconveyallkindsofinformation,whetheritisthedesireorrevelation,therefore,itmustbeavarietyofrhetoricalinterpretationofthetext,readthedreamofallkindsofrhetoricaldevices,canberelativelyeffectiveaccesstothemeaningofthedream.Therhetoric

8、inthedreamnarrativehaslongbeenneglectedbytheacademiccircles.Thisarticleattemptstoe