欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:53271941
大小:342.17 KB
页数:5页
时间:2020-04-17
《不同超滤量对高通量血液透析尿毒症毒素清除的影响.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在应用文档-天天文库。
1、国际泌尿系统杂志2014年9月第34卷第5期InternationalJournalofUrologyandNephrology,Sep2014,Vo1.34NO.5669·论著·不同超滤量对高通量血液透析尿毒症毒素清除的影响杨颖刘峻李芊夏熊芳吴传芳李赛春李祖前许忆新【摘要】目的探讨高通量血液透析(HFHD)在不同超滤量时对尿毒症毒素清除的影响以及与低通量血液透析(LFHD)和血液透析滤过(HDF)清除效果比较。方法从本院在透200多例维持性血液透析患者中选取符合人选标准75例,随机分成5组(HFHD2L组,H
2、FHD4L组,HFHD6L组,LFHD组,HDF组),每组15例。于透析上、下机前抽取静脉血送检小分子尿毒症毒素(简称小分子毒素,以下相同,包括UREA,Cr和P)、大分子尿毒症毒素(简称中大分子毒素,包括Hey,B2一MG和iPTH)和血浆蛋白质(包括ALB和CRP)等,并计算各自的下降率。同时,留取透析液做细菌培养和内毒素检测,记录患者透析时出现的并发症。结果五种透析方式对小中大分子尿毒素及血浆蛋白质的清除(下降率)比较:小分子毒素>中大分子毒素,差异有非常显著性意义(P3、下降率为负值)。组间比较:LFHD、HF—HD、HDF对小分子毒素的清除(下降率)达60%以上,三者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对中大分子毒素的清除(下降率)存在较大的区别,HDF>HFHD>LFHD。HFHD组三组内比较:中大分子毒素清除(下降率)随透析超滤量的增加呈下降趋势,但是这种差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应以LFHD发生病例数最多。HFHD和HDF病例数区别不大。结论HFHD治疗优势主要在于对中大分子毒素的清除明显优于LFHD,稍逊于HDF。但其价格低廉,经济实惠,可长期使用。对4、中大分子毒素的清除也不必刻意的通过增加透析超滤量来提高透析器的清除率。注意超纯透析用水和透析液的应用。【关键词】尿毒症;肾透析;超滤TheImpactofremovinguremictoxinsindifferentuhrafihrationfol’thepatientswithhigh—.fluxdialysisYangYing,LiuJun,LiQian,eta1.(BloodpurificationcenterandclinicallaboratoryofCenterHospitalofChangshac5、ity,Changsha410004,China)AbstractObjectivesToinvestigatetheimpactofremovinguremictoxinsindifferentultrallhrationinpa.tientstreatedwithHFHDc0mparingwithLFHDandHDF.Methods75ca8esfrommorethan200uremicpatientsinMHDwererandomizedtoaSsignfivegroups(HFHD2L,HFHIML,H6、FHD6L,LFHD,HDF),eachgroupin-eludes15cases.LowerMolecularWeight(LMW,include:Urea,Cr,P),MiddleandHighmolecularWeight(MHMW,include:Hey,B2一MG,iPTH),PlasmaProteins(PP,include:ALB,CRP)inbloodplasmaweremeasuredbeforeandafterdialysis,BacterialculturesandEndotoxincon7、centrationswerecheckedindialysisfluidanddialysiswater,andside—efectshappenedinpatientsduringdialysiswererecordedatthesametime.ResultsAfterthedialysisprocedure,nosignificantchangeswerefoundforsolutereductionratioofLMWandlowerclearance0fPP.Butthereareveryhighd8、iferentinMHMWbetweenthefivegroups.TheremovalofMHMWincreasedinHF—HDgroupswhichthepercentagechangeofSRRofMHMWwereinverselydecreasedbyincreasingultrafihrationdur-ingdialysis,therewereverysignifican
3、下降率为负值)。组间比较:LFHD、HF—HD、HDF对小分子毒素的清除(下降率)达60%以上,三者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对中大分子毒素的清除(下降率)存在较大的区别,HDF>HFHD>LFHD。HFHD组三组内比较:中大分子毒素清除(下降率)随透析超滤量的增加呈下降趋势,但是这种差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应以LFHD发生病例数最多。HFHD和HDF病例数区别不大。结论HFHD治疗优势主要在于对中大分子毒素的清除明显优于LFHD,稍逊于HDF。但其价格低廉,经济实惠,可长期使用。对
4、中大分子毒素的清除也不必刻意的通过增加透析超滤量来提高透析器的清除率。注意超纯透析用水和透析液的应用。【关键词】尿毒症;肾透析;超滤TheImpactofremovinguremictoxinsindifferentuhrafihrationfol’thepatientswithhigh—.fluxdialysisYangYing,LiuJun,LiQian,eta1.(BloodpurificationcenterandclinicallaboratoryofCenterHospitalofChangshac
5、ity,Changsha410004,China)AbstractObjectivesToinvestigatetheimpactofremovinguremictoxinsindifferentultrallhrationinpa.tientstreatedwithHFHDc0mparingwithLFHDandHDF.Methods75ca8esfrommorethan200uremicpatientsinMHDwererandomizedtoaSsignfivegroups(HFHD2L,HFHIML,H
6、FHD6L,LFHD,HDF),eachgroupin-eludes15cases.LowerMolecularWeight(LMW,include:Urea,Cr,P),MiddleandHighmolecularWeight(MHMW,include:Hey,B2一MG,iPTH),PlasmaProteins(PP,include:ALB,CRP)inbloodplasmaweremeasuredbeforeandafterdialysis,BacterialculturesandEndotoxincon
7、centrationswerecheckedindialysisfluidanddialysiswater,andside—efectshappenedinpatientsduringdialysiswererecordedatthesametime.ResultsAfterthedialysisprocedure,nosignificantchangeswerefoundforsolutereductionratioofLMWandlowerclearance0fPP.Butthereareveryhighd
8、iferentinMHMWbetweenthefivegroups.TheremovalofMHMWincreasedinHF—HDgroupswhichthepercentagechangeofSRRofMHMWwereinverselydecreasedbyincreasingultrafihrationdur-ingdialysis,therewereverysignifican
此文档下载收益归作者所有