如何提升生产力成为MLCC产业中的第一.doc

《如何提升生产力成为MLCC产业中的第一.doc》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。

1、目錄第四章如何提升生產力成為MLCC產業中的第一報告人：李文熙孫繼玲黃啟清謝國隆陸毓宏指導教授：劉賓陽壹、基本概念·····························································································4-1貳、產出之增加·························································································4-1一、R&DAction.···································

2、············································4-1二、ShopFloorSimulationSystemIntroduce.··································4-2三、EquipmentOutputimprove.························································4-2參、投入之減少·······················································································

3、···4-2一、HRProposal（MancostAnalysis）.··········································4-2二、EquipmentInputImprove.···························································4-34-4如何提升生產力成為MLCC產業中的第一壹、基本概念一、生產力與產出及投入間之關係式為：生產力＝產出/投入二、為提升生產力之努力方向有：（一）產出之增加1.R&DAction2.ShopFloorSimulationSystemIntroduce3.Equip

4、mentOutputimprove（二）投入之減少1.HRProposal（MancostAnalysis）2.EquipmentInputImprove貳、產出之增加一、R&DAction：（一）Low-Cap.Productivityimprovement（二）High-CapProductivityimprovement學理介紹：C＝K‧（A/d）‧（n-1），其中：C：capacitanceK：dielectricconstantCapacitanceisA：effectivearea－－＞reducingareamaintained,butd：dielectricthickness

5、－－＞reducingthicknessproductivityisn：numberoflayersincreased.（三）NPOProductivityimprovement4-4二、ShopFloorSimulationSystemIntroduce三、EquipmentOutputimprove（一）意義：100×100124×128ScreenPrinting（二）改善方案如下：1.124‧128equipmentdevelopProcessflowFoilcasterScreenprinterpressnotcher2.124×128project是將原來platesize由10

6、1×105改為124×128，主要針對上面四種機台作修改，而且在此區段所使用的jig和rack將全部更新，除了foilcaster以外，其他機台因空間不足，無法用舊機台修改，所以投資成本較大。M/CF/CS/PP/SN/TCost600K10300K11500K14000K3.由於將plate面積改大，在設備的設計上難度相對提高，譬如：（1）Stackingquality（2）Positioning（3）Jigdeformed（4）Pressure（5）Repairandmaintenance4.以上問題必須一一克服，才能有效提高output，根據理論計算，101×105改為124×128，

7、整個output會提高50%，但考慮到qualityissue，所以Yield可能會降低，即使如此，Totaloutput增加30%應是合理的目標。參、投入之減少一、HRProposal（MancostAnalysis）（一）現況：1.Phycomp人工成本為22~30%。4-42.集團內Phycomp（台灣）和Suzhou（大陸）相較之比為5：1，其原因為：（1）台灣平均薪資約為大陸3.5倍。（2）景氣低迷