欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:37893239
大小:506.23 KB
页数:7页
时间:2019-06-02
《针刺与牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效比较系统评价》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、光明中医2009年10月第24卷第lO期CJGMCMOctober2009.Vol24.10针刺与牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效比较的系统评价*孙攀杜元灏熊俊黎波1天津中医药大学(天津300193)2天津中医药大学第一附属医院(天津3o0193)摘要:目的:比较针刺与牵l治疗神经根型颈椎病(CSR)的临床疗效。方法:电子检索PubMed(1950-2008)、Ovid(1950-2008)、EBSCO(1973-2008)、Cohrance图书馆(2008年第2期)、CBM(1978-2006)、CNKI(1979-20
2、08)、VIP(1989-2008)、万方数据库(1998—2008),手工检索中文针灸杂志及有关学术会议论文汇编,收集针刺与牵;』治疗CSR的临床随机对照试验,由两名评价者独立提取资料并进行方法学质量评估。选择符合纳入标准的临床试验,采用RevMan4.2.8软件进行统计学分析。结果:8篇文献符合纳入标准,共1546例患者。8项研究均采用有效率为主要结局指标,Meta分析显示:针刺对照牵5I具有显著性差异[RR:1.24,95%CI(1.16,1.32),P3、著性差异[RR=1.10,95%CI(1.02,1.18),P=0.008];3项研究采用简化MPQ量表作为次要结局指标,VAS评分[WMD=1.53,95%CI(O.85,2.21),P<0.0001]和PPI评分[WMD=O.61,95%CI(0.50,0.71),P4、的疗效。关键词:针刺疗法;神经根型颈椎病;随机对照试验;系统评价doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003—8914.2009.10.002文章编号:1003.8914(2009)101824—07AcupunctureVersusTractionforCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyASystematicReviewSunPanDuYuanhaoXiongJunLiBolTianjinUniversityofTraditionalChineseMedicine,Tianjin305、0193,China2ThefirstteachinghospitalofTianjinuniversityofTCM,Tianjin300193,ChinaAbstract:0bjective:ToassesstheefficacyofacupunctureversustractioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathy.Methods:Randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)involvingacupunctureversustr6、actioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyweresearchedfromPubMed(1950to2008)、Ovid(1950to2008)、EBSCO(1973to2008)、CochraneLibrary(Issue2,2008)、CBM(1978to2006)、CNKI(1979to2008)、VIP(1989to2008)andWANFANGDatabase(1998to2008).Wealsohandsearchedrelevantjou7、rnalsandconferenceproceedings.Datawereextractedandevaluatedbytworeviewersindependentlywithaspeciallydesignedextractionform.TheCochraneCollaboration’sRevMan4.2.8softwarewasusedfordataanalyses.Results:Atotalof8trialsinvolving1546patientswereincluded.Efectiveratew8、asuseda8theprimaryresultantindexinalltheeightsyudies.Meta—analysesshowedthatefectiveratebetweenacupuncturegroupandtractiongroupwassignificantdiference【RIt1.24,95%cI(1.16to1.
3、著性差异[RR=1.10,95%CI(1.02,1.18),P=0.008];3项研究采用简化MPQ量表作为次要结局指标,VAS评分[WMD=1.53,95%CI(O.85,2.21),P<0.0001]和PPI评分[WMD=O.61,95%CI(0.50,0.71),P4、的疗效。关键词:针刺疗法;神经根型颈椎病;随机对照试验;系统评价doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003—8914.2009.10.002文章编号:1003.8914(2009)101824—07AcupunctureVersusTractionforCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyASystematicReviewSunPanDuYuanhaoXiongJunLiBolTianjinUniversityofTraditionalChineseMedicine,Tianjin305、0193,China2ThefirstteachinghospitalofTianjinuniversityofTCM,Tianjin300193,ChinaAbstract:0bjective:ToassesstheefficacyofacupunctureversustractioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathy.Methods:Randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)involvingacupunctureversustr6、actioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyweresearchedfromPubMed(1950to2008)、Ovid(1950to2008)、EBSCO(1973to2008)、CochraneLibrary(Issue2,2008)、CBM(1978to2006)、CNKI(1979to2008)、VIP(1989to2008)andWANFANGDatabase(1998to2008).Wealsohandsearchedrelevantjou7、rnalsandconferenceproceedings.Datawereextractedandevaluatedbytworeviewersindependentlywithaspeciallydesignedextractionform.TheCochraneCollaboration’sRevMan4.2.8softwarewasusedfordataanalyses.Results:Atotalof8trialsinvolving1546patientswereincluded.Efectiveratew8、asuseda8theprimaryresultantindexinalltheeightsyudies.Meta—analysesshowedthatefectiveratebetweenacupuncturegroupandtractiongroupwassignificantdiference【RIt1.24,95%cI(1.16to1.
4、的疗效。关键词:针刺疗法;神经根型颈椎病;随机对照试验;系统评价doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003—8914.2009.10.002文章编号:1003.8914(2009)101824—07AcupunctureVersusTractionforCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyASystematicReviewSunPanDuYuanhaoXiongJunLiBolTianjinUniversityofTraditionalChineseMedicine,Tianjin30
5、0193,China2ThefirstteachinghospitalofTianjinuniversityofTCM,Tianjin300193,ChinaAbstract:0bjective:ToassesstheefficacyofacupunctureversustractioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathy.Methods:Randomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)involvingacupunctureversustr
6、actioninthetreatmentofCervicalSpondyloticRadiculopathyweresearchedfromPubMed(1950to2008)、Ovid(1950to2008)、EBSCO(1973to2008)、CochraneLibrary(Issue2,2008)、CBM(1978to2006)、CNKI(1979to2008)、VIP(1989to2008)andWANFANGDatabase(1998to2008).Wealsohandsearchedrelevantjou
7、rnalsandconferenceproceedings.Datawereextractedandevaluatedbytworeviewersindependentlywithaspeciallydesignedextractionform.TheCochraneCollaboration’sRevMan4.2.8softwarewasusedfordataanalyses.Results:Atotalof8trialsinvolving1546patientswereincluded.Efectiveratew
8、asuseda8theprimaryresultantindexinalltheeightsyudies.Meta—analysesshowedthatefectiveratebetweenacupuncturegroupandtractiongroupwassignificantdiference【RIt1.24,95%cI(1.16to1.
此文档下载收益归作者所有