Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia

Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia

ID:39505325

大小:71.45 KB

页数:9页

时间:2019-07-04

Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia_第1页
Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia_第2页
Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia_第3页
Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia_第4页
Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia_第5页
资源描述:

《Federalism with and without political centralization China versus Russia》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、IMFStaffPapersVol.48,SpecialIssue=©2001InternationalMonetaryFundMVPY1+t()t=+QEVQXPεε+>*FederalismWithandWithoutPoliticalCentralization:ChinaVersusRussiaOLIVIERBLANCHARDANDANDREISHLEIFER*(β=+yInChina,localgovernmentshaveactivelycontributedtothegrowthofnewfirms.InRussia,localgover

2、nmentshavetypicallystoodintheway,beitthroughtaxa-tion,regulation,orcorruption.WearguethatthedifferencecanbetracedtoliesinthedegreeofpoliticalcentralizationpresentinChina,butnotinRussia.In*Chinathecentralgovernmenthasbeenstronganddisciplinedenoughtoinducelocalgovernmentstofavorgr

3、owth.InRussia,ithasnot.Weagree,butwithan=PPSimportantcaveat.WebelievetheexperienceofRussiaindicatesthatanotheringredientiscrucial,namelypoliticalcentralization.[JELP30,P50]verthepastdecade,China’sGDPhasgrownatoneofthehighestratesin=LYi(Otheworld,Russia’satoneofthelowest.Thediffe

4、rencehascomemostly,fromthegrowthofthenewprivatesector.InChina,thenewprivatesectorhasthrived.InRussia,ithasstagnated.*,,YSPWhythissharpdivergencebetweenprivatesectorevolutions?Inbothcoun-tries,theevidencepointstotheimportanceofthebehavioroflocalgovernments.PInChina,localgovernmen

5、tshaveactivelycontributedtothegrowthofnewfirms(Oi,1992;QianandWeingast,1997).InRussia,localgovernmentshavetypicallystoodintheway,beitthroughtaxation,regulation,orcorruption(Shleifer,1997;Johnson,Kaufmann,andShleifer,1997;McKinsey,1999;andEBRD,1999).1−*OlivierBlanchardisProfessor

6、ofEconomicsattheMassachusettsInstituteofTechnology.Andrei1ShleiferisProfessorofEconomicsatHarvardUniversity.TheythankStanleyFischer,AlanGelb,Ed+Glaeser,SimonJohnson,RatnaSahay,JimSnyder,andDanielTreismanforcomments.TheythanktheEsttsNationalScienceFoundationforfinancialassistance

7、.1TheMcKinseystudyof10sectorsoftheRussianeconomy,andofthespecificobstaclesfacedbynewfirmsineachsector,isparticularlyinstructiveinthisregard.Fi**(1+)=S171OlivierBlanchardandAndreiShleiferTherearetwomainhypothesesfortheattitudesoflocalgovernmentsinRussia.Thefirst—callit“capture”—i

8、sthatlocalgovernmentshavebeencapturedbytheiniti

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。