欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:38274050
大小:613.47 KB
页数:4页
时间:2019-05-25
《《不同品质食用白酒致大鼠肝脏损伤差异分析-论文》》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、现代预防医学2014年第41卷第9期ModemPreventiveMedicine,2014,Vo1.41,NO.9·l667··实验技术及其应用·不同品质食用白酒致大鼠肝脏损伤差异分析陈蕊,叶正茂,鲁蕾,范雪佳,饶家权,杜礼泉,许欣1.四川大学华西公共卫生学院(华西第四医院),四川成都610041;2.四川省绵阳市丰谷酒业有限责任公司,四川绵阳621000摘要:目的探讨不同品质浓香型白酒致sD大鼠肝脏损伤差异。方法55只雄性sD大鼠随机分为:酒样①组、酒样②组、48v/v酒精对照组以及空白对照组,以慢性酒精性肝病大鼠模型建立方
2、式灌胃30d后处死实验动物,检测血清中氧化指标超氧化物歧化酶SOD、丙二醛MDA;肝功能指标谷丙转氨酶ALT、谷草转氨酶AST、谷氨酰转肽酶GGT;血脂指标甘油三酯TG、高密度脂蛋白HDL—C、胆固醇CHOL;并制作病理学切片,用SPSS16.0对结果进行统计学分析。结果连续灌胃30d后,各指标均出现明显差异,与①号酒样组相比,②号酒样组的SOD降低(P<0.05)、MDA(P<0.01);ALT、AST、GGT均升高(P3、P<0.05),从病理切片来看,②号酒样组比①号酒样组的病变程度更严重。结论30d灌胃后②号酒样对肝脏的损害大于①号酒样,提示不同品质白酒致肝脏损伤存在差异。关键词:不同品质浓香型白酒;肝脏损伤;SD大鼠中图分类号:Rl15文献标志码:A文章编号:1003—8507(2014)09—1667—04ComparisonontheimpairmentsofdiferentkindsofLuzhou-flavorliquor0nratSIlVerCHENRui,YEZheng-mao,LULei,FANXue-jia,RAOJia-q4、uan,DULi—quan,XUXinWestChinaSchoolofPublwHealth(WestChinaFourthHospit奶,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,Sichuan610041,ChinaAbstract:ObjectiveTheaimofthisresearchwastoevaluatethediferentdamagestolivercausedbydiferentqualityofLuzhou-flavorliquor.Methods55healthymaleSDratswere5、randomlydividedinto:winesamplegroup①,winesamplegroup②,alcoholcontrolgroup(48%ethanolsolution)andblankcontrolgroup,lavagedtheseratswithchronicalcoholismfor30days.Im—pairmentsofliverwereobservedaftertheratsweresacrificedanddetectedsel31moxidativedamageindexincludedT—SO6、D,MDA;liverfunctionindexesincludedALT,AST,GGT;bloodfatindexedincludedTG,HDL—C,CHOL;SeDlm,madepathologysection;usedSPSS16.0todothestatisticalanalysis.ResultsTherewasastatisticaldiference(P<0.051betweentwoLuzhou-Ⅱavorliquorgroupswhichwereadministeredintragastrieallyfor7、30days.Comparedwiththegroup①,thecontentofSODwaslower‘P<0.05),MDAwashigher(P<0.05);ALT,AST,GGT,HDL-C,CHOLwerehigher(P8、rlavagingratsfor30days,comparedtothegroup①,theextentofdamageinliverisseriousinthegroup②,whichdemon—stratesthatdiferentkindsofliquor
3、P<0.05),从病理切片来看,②号酒样组比①号酒样组的病变程度更严重。结论30d灌胃后②号酒样对肝脏的损害大于①号酒样,提示不同品质白酒致肝脏损伤存在差异。关键词:不同品质浓香型白酒;肝脏损伤;SD大鼠中图分类号:Rl15文献标志码:A文章编号:1003—8507(2014)09—1667—04ComparisonontheimpairmentsofdiferentkindsofLuzhou-flavorliquor0nratSIlVerCHENRui,YEZheng-mao,LULei,FANXue-jia,RAOJia-q
4、uan,DULi—quan,XUXinWestChinaSchoolofPublwHealth(WestChinaFourthHospit奶,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,Sichuan610041,ChinaAbstract:ObjectiveTheaimofthisresearchwastoevaluatethediferentdamagestolivercausedbydiferentqualityofLuzhou-flavorliquor.Methods55healthymaleSDratswere
5、randomlydividedinto:winesamplegroup①,winesamplegroup②,alcoholcontrolgroup(48%ethanolsolution)andblankcontrolgroup,lavagedtheseratswithchronicalcoholismfor30days.Im—pairmentsofliverwereobservedaftertheratsweresacrificedanddetectedsel31moxidativedamageindexincludedT—SO
6、D,MDA;liverfunctionindexesincludedALT,AST,GGT;bloodfatindexedincludedTG,HDL—C,CHOL;SeDlm,madepathologysection;usedSPSS16.0todothestatisticalanalysis.ResultsTherewasastatisticaldiference(P<0.051betweentwoLuzhou-Ⅱavorliquorgroupswhichwereadministeredintragastrieallyfor
7、30days.Comparedwiththegroup①,thecontentofSODwaslower‘P<0.05),MDAwashigher(P<0.05);ALT,AST,GGT,HDL-C,CHOLwerehigher(P8、rlavagingratsfor30days,comparedtothegroup①,theextentofdamageinliverisseriousinthegroup②,whichdemon—stratesthatdiferentkindsofliquor
8、rlavagingratsfor30days,comparedtothegroup①,theextentofdamageinliverisseriousinthegroup②,whichdemon—stratesthatdiferentkindsofliquor
此文档下载收益归作者所有