MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究

MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究

ID:34874822

大小:886.52 KB

页数:31页

时间:2019-03-13

MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究_第1页
MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究_第2页
MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究_第3页
MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究_第4页
MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究_第5页
资源描述:

《MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、福建医科大学硕士学位论文分类号:R683.41学校代码:10392学科专业代码:105109学号:2151003171硕士学位论文MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究Acomparativestudyofminimallyinvasivepercutaneousplateosteoynthesisandopenreductionandinternalfixationforthetreatmentofhumerussurgicalneckfractures学位类型:临床医学硕士所在学院:第一临床医学院申请人姓名:陈航学科、专

2、业:外科学(骨外科)导师:叶君健教授研究起止日期:2016年3月至2018年3月答辩委员会主席:林建华教授答辩日期:2018年05月29日二○一八年六月福建医科大学硕士学位论文福建医科大学硕士学位论文目录英文缩略词汇表„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„1中文摘要„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„2英文摘要„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„4前言„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„61资料和方法„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„71.1一般资料„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„71.2

3、手术方法„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„81.3术后处理„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„101.4观察指标„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„101.5统计学方法„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„112结果与随访„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„112.1围手术期观察指标结果对比„„„„„„„„„„„„112.2术后肩关节恢复结果对比„„„„„„„„„„„„„122.3并发症情况„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„133讨论„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„134结论„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„

4、„„„„„„„„„185参考文献„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„19综述„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„21致谢„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„28福建医科大学硕士学位论文英文缩略词表(Abbreviationsandacronyms)缩略语英文全称中文全称MIPPOminimallyinvasivepercutaneousplateosteoynthesis经皮微创接骨板ORIFopenreductionandinternalfixation切开复位内固定BOopenreductionandin

5、ternalfixation生物学内固定原则PHLOSProximalhumeruslockedanatomicalsteelplate肱骨近端锁定接骨板1福建医科大学硕士学位论文MIPPO技术与传统切开复位内固定术治疗肱骨外科颈骨折的比较研究中文摘要目的:探讨经皮微创钢板内固定术(MIPPO)与传统切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效对比。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2013年01月至2017年10月期间,福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的肱骨外科颈骨折的患者,符合纳入标准的共60例。根据所采取的手术方式不同,将60例病人分为两组,经皮微

6、创钢板内固定术(MIPPO)组和传统切开复位内固定术(ORIF)组。MIPPO组共28例,平均年龄56.8岁,其中男性8例,女性20例,左侧15例,右侧13例,按照Neer分型两部分骨折17例,三部分骨折10例,四部分骨折1例;ORIF组共32例,平均年龄63.6岁,其中男性11例,女性21例,左侧14例,右侧18例,两部分骨折22例,三部分骨折6例,四部分骨折4例。观察指标包括两组患者术前住院天数,手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、总住院天数、骨折愈合时间、末次随访Neer肩关节功能评分以及末次随访VAS疼痛评分。术后第2天、第6周、第12周、第

7、6个月定期复查X线,并应用SPSS22.0软件对结果进行统计学分析,对比两组患者的临床疗效差异。结果:两组患者的一般情况包括性别、年龄、左右侧别、骨折分型以及术前住院天数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。所有的患者均获得随访,随访时间6-32个月,平均随访时间16.5个月。根据统计学分析结果,MIPPO组平均切口长度(MIPPO组:4.6cm;ORIF组:12.5cm),平均手术时间(MIPPO组:90.3min;ORIF组:111.8min),术中平均出血量(MIPPO组:47.2ml;ORIF组:87.8ml),平均总住院天数(MIP

8、PO组:12.6天;ORIF组:16.3天),平均术后Neer肩关节功能评分(MIPPO组:90.21;OR

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。