a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811

a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811

ID:31611642

大小:2.25 MB

页数:16页

时间:2019-01-15

a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811_第1页
a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811_第2页
a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811_第3页
a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811_第4页
a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811_第5页
资源描述:

《a framework for the comparative analysis of organizations 2091811》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、AFrameworkfortheComparativeAnalysisofOrganizationsAuthor(s):CharlesPerrowSource:AmericanSociologicalReview,Vol.32,No.2(Apr.,1967),pp.194-208Publishedby:AmericanSociologicalAssociationStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2091811.Accessed:12/12/201322:43YouruseoftheJSTOR

2、archiveindicatesyouracceptanceoftheTerms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weusei

3、nformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org..AmericanSociologicalAssociationiscollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoAmericanSociologicalReview.http:/

4、/www.jstor.orgThiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onThu,12Dec201322:43:08PMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditions194AMERICANSOCIOLOGICALREVIEWoverwhichtheindividualpresumablyhastionismoreequitable?Whichismore"just"somecontroland,therefore,"merits."Inifvolitionisinvol

5、vedinneitherthementalotherwords,theindividual'sprivatecapaci-capacitiesthatanindividualinheritsnorthetiesareinvolved.Butdonottheindividual'ssocialadvantagesconferreduponhimbyhiscapacitiesdependtomorethanatrivialde-parents?greeuponthegeneticmaterialwithwhichAlthoughonemo

6、deisperhapsnomoreheentersthesocialcontest,andoverwhichequitablethantheother,onedoesappeartohehasnomorecontrolthanhisraceorhisbemorerational.Here,wewouldagreewithsex?And,therefore,isnottheallocationofLinton'sposition,andothers,thatsocialstatusaccordingtoabilityactuallyju

7、stasheredity,whilenot"dysfunctional"insim-muchan"ascribed"criterionasthemoreplersocieties,nolongermeetsthedemandstraditionalassignmentofpositionsbasedonofacomplextechnology.Totheextentthat"social"heredity?thesurvivalofourpresenttechnology(andIfoneofthemajorsocialissuesf

8、acingsocialorder)dependsupontheeffectivecontemporarysocieties,aswehavesug-utilizationofhumanresources,thentheg

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。