欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:21112808
大小:72.03 KB
页数:7页
时间:2018-10-19
《造口专项护理对直肠癌患者造口术后生活质量的影响》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。
1、造口专项护理对直肠癌患者造口术后生活质量的影响王爱红罗娜赵皓冰中国医科大学附属盛京医院胸外科摘要:目的探讨造门专项护理对直肠癌患者造门术后生活质量的影响。方法选取2015年6月至2016年3月间中国医科大学附属盛京医院收治的行造口专项护理的42例直肠癌造口术患者为观察组,选取同期行常规护理的40例直肠癌造口术患者为对照组,比较两组患者造口护理情况、造口适应性、并发症及生活质量。结果观察组患者造U适成性中生理功能、心理状态和社会交往评分分别为(60.21±10.25)分、(64.25±12.33)
2、分和(48.36±11.23)分,分别高于对照组患者的(48.29±10.58)分、(50.47±11.47)分和(32.12±5.79)分,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组患者造口护理达标率和相关知识掌握率分别为88.1%和90.5%,均高于对照组的70.0%和75.0%,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。护理后,观察组患者造U相关并发症发生率为7.1%,低于对照组的22.5%,生活质量为(87.25±10.23)分,高于对照组的(83.25±11.05)分,差异均有统计学意义
3、(均P<0.05)。结论造口专项护理能提高直肠癌患者造口术后自我护理和造口适应性,减少并发症,改善患者术后生活质量。关键词:造口专项护理;直肠癌造口术;生活质量;作者简介:王爱红,女,主管护师,主耍从事胸外科护理专业。收稿日期:2016-12-30EffectofspecialcareofthestomaonthepostoperativequalityoflifeinpatientswithrectalcancerundergoingrectostomyWANGAi-hongLUONaZHAO
4、Hao-bingDepartmentofThoracicSurgery,ShengjingHospitalAffiliatedtoChinaMedicalUniversity;Abstract:ObjectiveToinvestigatetheeffectofspecialcareofthestomaonthepostoperativequalityoflifeinpatientswithrectalcancerundergoingrcctostomy.MethodsForty-twopatie
5、ntswithrectalcancerundergoingrectostomywhoweregivenspecialnursingcareofstomaatShengjingHospitalAffiliatedtoChinaMedicalUniversityfromJune2015toMarch2016wereselectedastheobservationgroupand42patientswithrectalcancerundergoingrectostomywhoreceivedconve
6、ntionalnursingduringthesameperiodwereselectedasthecontrolgroup.Stomacare,stomaadaptability,complicationsandlifequalitywerecomparedbetweenthetwogroups.ResultsTheadaptabilityscoresofphysiologicalfunction,psychologicalconditionandinterpersonalrelationsh
7、ipwas60.21±10.25,64.25±12.33and48.36±11.23intheobservationgro叩than48.29±10.58,50.47±11.47and32.12±5.79ofthecontrolgroup(allP<0.05)•Thecompliancerateofstomacareandmasteryrateofknowledgewas88.1%and90.5%intheobservationgroupwhichwashigherthan70.0%and75.
8、0%ofthecontrolgroup(allP<0.05).Afternursingcare,theincidenceofstoma-relatedcomplicationswas7.1%intheobservationgroupwhichwaslowerthan22.5%ofthecontrolgroup.Thequalityoflifescorewas87.25土10.23intheobservationgroupwhichwashigherthan83.25±11.05of83.25±1
此文档下载收益归作者所有