欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:32840698
大小:1.38 MB
页数:30页
时间:2019-02-16
《不同危险因素与轻度认知功能障碍亚型关系的研究》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、青岛大学硕士学位论文不同危险因素与轻度认知功能障碍亚型关系的研究姓名:张永红申请学位级别:硕士专业:神经病学指导教师:邢成名20120524不同危险因素与轻度认知功能障碍亚型关系的研究摘要目的探讨遗忘型、非遗忘型轻度认知功能障碍患者不同危险因素的差异。方法收集2011年1月至2011年9月于青岛市市属三家三级医院神经内科住院的65—75岁轻度认知功能障碍患者的健康资料,应用简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)全面评价患者的认知功能,采用Petersen标准将轻度认知功能障碍的病人分成遗忘型(aMCI)和非遗忘型(non-aMCI)两组,比较两组患者
2、的不同危险因素。结果单变量分析显示,aMCI和non-aMCI两组患者的糖尿病、高胆固醇、MoCA评分存在显著差异(P3、因素对aMCI、non-aMCI两组患者所施加的效应不同。硕士研究生:张永红(神经病学)指导教师:邢成名教授关键词:轻度认知功能障碍;分型:蒙特利尔认知评估量表;危险因素AssotiationofDifferentRiskFactorswithSubtypesofMildCognitiveImpairmentAbstractObjectiveToexploretheassotiationofdifferentriskfactors、析thsubtypesofmildcognitiveimpairment(amnesticvers惦non-amnestic).MethodsAll4、thesubjectswithmildcognitiveimpairment(MCI)aged65—75yearsoldwererecruitedfromneurologydepartmentof3third-classhospitalsofQingdao,admittedfromJanuary2011toSeptember2011.Theyweresystematicallyevaluatedwithmini-mentalstateexamination(M[MSE)andMontrealCognitiveAssessment(MoCA),thenhealthconditio5、nswerecollected.AccordingtoPetersen。Sstandards,patientsweredividedintoanmesticmildcognitiveimpairment(alⅥCI)andnon-amnesticmildcognitiveimpairment(non-蝴CI)groupstocomparedifferentriskfactorsbetweenthem.ResultsUnivariateanalysisshowedthereWG'Testatisticalsignificanceinhightotal-cholesterol、di6、abetesmellitus、MoCAscorebet、ⅣI自enaMCIandnon-aMCIgroups(P<0.05).OnMultivariatelogisticregressionanalysisMoCASCOI℃(oR1.081,95%CI1.001—1.204:P---O.040)intheaMClgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthenon-aMCIgroup。Diabetesmellitus(oR0.258,95%C10.096--0.6951P=0.009)WaSpreferentially他l砷edtonon-aMC7、lgroup.mleveloftotal-cholesterol(OR13.345,95%CI1.127一158.085;P---0.011)intheaMClgroupWaSsignificantlyhigherthanthatinthenon-aMClgroupandhightotal-cholesterolwasaindependentriskfactorforaMCI.ConclusionDifferentriskfactorsappearedtoexertdifferenteffe
3、因素对aMCI、non-aMCI两组患者所施加的效应不同。硕士研究生:张永红(神经病学)指导教师:邢成名教授关键词:轻度认知功能障碍;分型:蒙特利尔认知评估量表;危险因素AssotiationofDifferentRiskFactorswithSubtypesofMildCognitiveImpairmentAbstractObjectiveToexploretheassotiationofdifferentriskfactors、析thsubtypesofmildcognitiveimpairment(amnesticvers惦non-amnestic).MethodsAll
4、thesubjectswithmildcognitiveimpairment(MCI)aged65—75yearsoldwererecruitedfromneurologydepartmentof3third-classhospitalsofQingdao,admittedfromJanuary2011toSeptember2011.Theyweresystematicallyevaluatedwithmini-mentalstateexamination(M[MSE)andMontrealCognitiveAssessment(MoCA),thenhealthconditio
5、nswerecollected.AccordingtoPetersen。Sstandards,patientsweredividedintoanmesticmildcognitiveimpairment(alⅥCI)andnon-amnesticmildcognitiveimpairment(non-蝴CI)groupstocomparedifferentriskfactorsbetweenthem.ResultsUnivariateanalysisshowedthereWG'Testatisticalsignificanceinhightotal-cholesterol、di
6、abetesmellitus、MoCAscorebet、ⅣI自enaMCIandnon-aMCIgroups(P<0.05).OnMultivariatelogisticregressionanalysisMoCASCOI℃(oR1.081,95%CI1.001—1.204:P---O.040)intheaMClgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthenon-aMCIgroup。Diabetesmellitus(oR0.258,95%C10.096--0.6951P=0.009)WaSpreferentially他l砷edtonon-aMC
7、lgroup.mleveloftotal-cholesterol(OR13.345,95%CI1.127一158.085;P---0.011)intheaMClgroupWaSsignificantlyhigherthanthatinthenon-aMClgroupandhightotal-cholesterolwasaindependentriskfactorforaMCI.ConclusionDifferentriskfactorsappearedtoexertdifferenteffe
此文档下载收益归作者所有