资源描述：
《23. the right to security-24 rights and security for human rights sceptics》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。
1、23TheRighttoSecurityLioraLazarusIntroductionTherighttosecurityisenshrinedininternationalhumanrightstreatiesandconsti-tutionsglobally.Inmanyoftheseprovisions,therightisarticulatedalongsidetherighttolibertyfromthestate.Inothers,therightislinkedtofreedomfromviolenceorbodilyinvasionfromnon-stateactors
2、.Theserightsgiverisetocorrelativedutieswhichcanattimesappeardiametricallyopposed.Onerightcallsforprotectionfromthestate,whiletheothercallsforstateprotection.Theseopposingdimensionsgiverisetodifferentphilosophicaljustificationsforwhysecurityoughttoberegardedasahuman right.Atfirstblush,bothaspectsof
3、therighttosecurityseemaxiomaticallyagoodthing.Allpeoplesharetheambitiontolivefreefromfearofattack,lossoflife,arbitraryarrest,detentionorcoerciveinterrogation.Thischapterexploresthetheoreticalargu-mentsthatsupporttherecognitionofthatambitionasarightworthyoflegalandmoralprotection.SectionI identifie
4、scompetingconceptionsofsecurityinthethe-oriesofHobbesandLocke.SectionIIdiscussesthephilosophicaljustificationsfortherighttosecurityintheworkofBlackstone,Shue,Fredman,Powell,andRamsay.SectionIIIexposestheproblemsassociatedwithbroadconceptionsofsecurityasameta-right,andarguesinfavourofaspecificandna
5、rrowconceptionofthe right.I.CompetingConceptionsofSecurityBeforeembarkingonthisanalysisitisworthoursettingoutsomekeydistinctions.Thereisadifferencebetweenrecognizingthe‘good’ofsecurity,andrecognizingwhetherspecificactionstakeninitspursuitconstituteasocialgood.Thereisalsoadifferencebetweenrecognizi
6、ngthesocialgoodofsecurity,anddecidingthatweoughttorecognizeandprotectanindividual’srighttosecurity.Finally,thereisadifferencebetweenrecognizingarighttosecurityinprinciple,anddeterminingthescopeofthecorrelativeobligationsitplacesuponstatesandtheweightitholdsrelativetootherrights.Whatmakessecurityag
7、ood?LoaderandWalkerarguethatsecurityisa‘“thick”publicgood’,a‘greatcivilizingforce’,anda‘necessaryandvirtuouscomponentofthegoodsociety’.1Theirargumentsarenotwithoutkeyantecedents,forHobbesandLockethoughtcarefullya
