国内中文期刊发表的中医药系统综述和Meta分析文献质量再评价_李青

《国内中文期刊发表的中医药系统综述和Meta分析文献质量再评价_李青》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。

1、·28·Кࣘᇏ၄ူն࿐࿐Бčᇏ၄ਢԵϱĎ2012୍5ᄅđ19č3Ď·࿖ᆣ၄࿐·ݓଽᇏ໓௹़іᇏ၄ူ༢๤ሸඍބMetaٳ༅໓ངᇉਈᄜ௟ࡎ*12111#৙ౝ༱Ꮽକ᪤ࢱ຦გၪਾࡹ௜č1Кࣘᇏ၄ူն࿐࿖ᆣ၄࿐ᇏྏКࣘ100029Ġ2Кࣘᇏ၄ူն࿐תٚ၄ჽĎᅋေğଢ௟ࡎݓଽᇏ໓௹़іᇏ၄ူ༢๤ሸඍބMetaٳ༅໓ངٚم࿐ᇉਈބБۡᇉਈđѩაၛສݓᇏ෬࡟ࠏෘ࠹مٚbࢠбྛࣉݔࢲࡎ௟ਈᇉඍሸ๤༢іᆩຩčCNKIĎaᇏ໓॓࠯௹़ಆ໓ඔऌ९čVIPĎaᇏݓള໾၄࿐໓ངඔऌ९čCBMĎaຣٚ௹़ં໓ඔऌ९đ࡟෬ൈࡗሱ۲ඔऌ९ࡹ९ࢩᇀ2011୍12ᄅ

2、đ࡫مٚඍሸ๤༢ᅶοđང໓༅ٳateMބඍሸ๤༢ྟਏᇍീծყۄູቔمਏူ၄ᇏၛႵ෮ק࿐ᇉਈ௟ࡎAMSTARਈі11ۡБބ࿐مٚఃؓѩ༏ྐܱཌྷ౼ิଢ่27۱ૼലAMSIRPٓܿۡБ࠽ݓބଢ่۱ᇉਈࣉྛ௟ࡎbࢲمٚb൝౴ശഈ୍ᇯӯਈඔང໓đང໓і༅ٳateMބඍሸ๤༢ူ၄ᇏ௉666ࠆ܋ݔ࿐ᇉਈ௟ࡎࢲაۚਈᇉ࿐مٚ౏đۚ҂ਈᇉ࿐مٚང໓ඔ؟ൕཁݔі୍ս໭ܱčP=0.121ĎĠ2007୍ၛުٚ෬࡟ང໓ࠣӱݖᄴ࿊࣮࿹aࡎ௟ਈᇉང໓ೆବaଢีۡБᄝđбཌྷສၛაང໓༅ٳateMބඍሸ๤༢і૫Ⴕ෮گႨҐaֆང໓࣮࿹Ԣஆ܂ิໃa๬Ԋၭ০ܱཌྷૼඪໃ

3、aσ࣮ٚ࿹௹భكಌᄝթ֌đࣉڿކࢲअᆷѓ໙ีbࢲં఼ؓࡆႋđۚิրႵಖಯਈᇉང໓༅ٳateMބඍሸ๤༢ူ၄ᇏі़௹໓ᇏଽݓՖ൙ᇏ၄ူ༢๤ሸඍ॓࿹ದჴٚم࿐஡࿞bܱ࡯Սğᇏ၄ူĠ༢๤ሸඍĠMetaٳ༅Ġٚم࿐Ġᇉਈ௟ࡎᇏ๭োٳğR24ReevaluationonqualityofTCMsystematicreviewsandMeta-analysesdocumentspublishedindomesticChinesejournals*12111#LIQing,XIAYun,MUYu-jie,WANGYu-yi,LIUJian-p

4、ing(1CenterforEvidence-BasedChineseMedicine,BeijingUniversityofChineseMedicine,Beijing100029;2DongfangHospital,BeijingUniversityofChineseMedicine)Abstract:ObjectiveToevaluatemethodologyqualityandreportingqualityofTCMsystematicreviewsandMeta-analysesdocumentspublished

5、indomesticChinesejournals,andcomparethemwithqualityevaluationresultsofsystematicreviewspublishedbefore.MethodsThedocumentswereretrievedfromChinaNationalNetworkKnowledgeInfrastructure(CNKI),ChineseScientificJournalDatabase(VIP),ChineseBioMedicalLiteratureDatabase(CBM)

6、andWanfangDatabase,andtheretrievingdurationwasfromthebuildingtimeofthesedatabasestoDec.2011.AlltherapeuticsystematicreviewsandMeta-analysisdocumentstakingTCMtherapiesasinterventionalmeasureswereidentified.Accordingto11itemsinAMSTARscaleand27itemsinPRISMA,therelativei

7、nformationwasextractedandthemethodologyqualityandreportingqualitywereevaluated.ResultsThereweretotally666documentsofTCMsystematicreviewsandMeta-analysisextracted,andthenumberofdocumentsshowedaincreasingtrendyearbyyear.Theresultsofmethodologyqualityevaluationshowedtha

8、tthemajorityofdocumentswaslowerinmethodologyqualityandtherewasnorelationbetweenmethodologyqualityandpublishingyears(P=0.121).Thecom