文心雕龙文学美学思想研究

《文心雕龙文学美学思想研究》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、山东大学博士学位论文《文心雕龙》文学美学思想研究姓名：戚良德申请学位级别：博士专业：文艺学指导教师：谭好哲20070401山东大学博士学位论文的文学接受论，从而集中而典型地展现出中国文学理论和美学之独特的话语风貌，成为中国文论和美学的话语之本和理论之源。四是对《文心雕龙》文本美学思想的研究。“文心雕龙”之“文”，含义相当广泛；除了指各种各样的文章以外，它的一个重要含义是感性形式美。刘勰把各种各样的“文”作为不同的美的形态和形式，并以此为基础，提出了“风清骨峻，即体成势”的审美理想，最后又具体落实到声律、比兴等艺术形式之美。可以说，《文心雕龙》乃是中国古代最为系统、最具理论深度、最贴近文学创作实

2、际的文学美学著作，也是世界文艺理论史和美学史上不可多得文学美学著作。关键词文心雕龙：哲学基础；文学美学观；文学创作论；文本美学山东大学博士学位论文ABSTRACTTheresearchofWen)onDiaoLong亿iteraryHeartCarvingDragons)hasbecomeasystematicspecialty一己ongXue(Dragon-ology)withover350monographsand6，000articlesonitpublishedinandoutofChinainthepastonehundredyears．Tllisisuniqueinthestudy

3、ofChineseclassicalliterarycriticismandclassicalaesthetics．Wecansaythatitisachoiceofhistory．BecauseinonehandalargenumberofresearchershavecommoninterestinWen)OnDiaoLongandattachgreatimportancetoit，SOtheyresearchitwithoutpriorconsultation．Especially,manyfamousscholarsofcultureandmastersofstudiesofChine

4、seancientcivilizationpaycloseattentiontoit，andhavewrittendownsomefamousacademicmonographs，suchasHuangKan,FanWenlan，LuKanru,WangLiqi，ZhanYing，YangMingzhao，ZhangGuangnian，WangYuanhua,RaoZongyiandSOon．Theya11havewrittendownsomemonographsaboutWen)onDiaoLong,althoughmostofthemarenotmajorinLongXue．It’Snod

5、oubtthatthegreatwofk-一耽蚪X／nDiaoLonghastheuniquedl啪．Intheotherhand．theSOcalled‘‘choiceofhistory'’，isrepresentedinthattheacademicfocushandeddownfromgenerationtogenerationhasbeenaimedatAestheticsofWenXinDiaoLong．However,itisstilladifficultworkandanunfinishedtasktograsptheideologicalsystemofliteraryaest

6、heticsofWenXinDiaoLongaccurately．ThispaperstudiestheliteraryaestheticsthoughtofWen)finDiaoLonginfouraspects．First，itstudiesthephilosophybasisofit．Asthe“classicalwork'’ofliterarycriticismandaestheticsoftheWei，Jin，NorthernandSouthernDynasties，Wen爿跏DiaoLongnotonlycontainsabundantliteraryaestheticsthoug

7、ht．butalsothedoctrinesoftheConfucianism，Taoism，MetaphysicsandBuddhism．TheuniqueplaceofWenXinDiaoLongwhichisdifferentfromusualmonographsofChineseclassicalliterarycriticism，isthatLiuXiewhoisthewriterof}