资源描述：
《A Defense of the Kantian Interpretation.pdf》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、ADefenseoftheKantianInterpretationStephenL.DarwallEthics,Vol.86,No.2.(Jan.,1976),pp.164-170.StableURL:http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0014-1704%28197601%2986%3A2%3C164%3AADOTKI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-REthicsiscurrentlypublishedbyTheUniversityofChicagoPress.You
2、ruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceofJSTOR'sTermsandConditionsofUse,availableathttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html.JSTOR'sTermsandConditionsofUseprovides,inpart,thatunlessyouhaveobtainedpriorpermission,youmaynotdownloadanentireissueofajourn
3、alormultiplecopiesofarticles,andyoumayusecontentintheJSTORarchiveonlyforyourpersonal,non-commercialuse.Pleasecontactthepublisherregardinganyfurtheruseofthiswork.Publishercontactinformationmaybeobtainedathttp://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html.Eachc
4、opyofanypartofaJSTORtransmissionmustcontainthesamecopyrightnoticethatappearsonthescreenorprintedpageofsuchtransmission.JSTORisanindependentnot-for-profitorganizationdedicatedtoandpreservingadigitalarchiveofscholarlyjournals.Formoreinformationregarding
5、JSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org.http://www.jstor.orgFriApr2000:05:092007ADEFENSEOFTHEKANTIANINTERPRETATION*StephenL.DarwallUniversityofNorthCarolinaOliverJohnsonarguesthatRawls'sclaimtoaKantianinterpretationofhistheoryofjusticeisunsupportable.'In
6、deed,JohnsonholdsthatthemainlinesofRawls'stheoryaresuchthatitisinprofoundconflictwithKant'satthreebasicpoints.HearguesthattheRawlsiantheoryofjusticehasnoplacefor,andconflictswith,theKantiannotionsofautonomy,thecategoricalimperative,andpurepracticalrea
7、-son.IfindtheideathatthereisaKantianinterpretationofRawls'stheoryaveryattractiveone.AndthoughIshallnotgiveasustainedargumentforthisposition,IwilltrytogiveadefenseofthisviewagainstJohnson'scriticismsofit.JustwhatdoesRawlsmeanbythethesisthathistheoryhas
8、aKantianinterpretation?Itakethemainforceofthisclaimtobethat"theoriginalpositionmaybeviewed,then,asaproceduralinterpretationofKant'sconceptionofauton-omyandthecategoricalimperati~e."~TheinterestinthisthesisisnotmerelytolocateRawls'sviewswithint
