中国英语专业学生议论文写作中的谬误研究——‘语用-辩证’-修辞论辩视角

《中国英语专业学生议论文写作中的谬误研究——‘语用-辩证’-修辞论辩视角》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、FallaciesinChineseEnglishMajors’ArgumentativeEssays：A“‘Pragma—dialectics'-RhetoricalArgumentation’’ApproachABSTRACTThe“lackofthought'’ofChineseEnglishMajors(Huang，1998；Gao，1999；Wen&Zhou，2006)inspiressomescholarstostudythinkingfeaturesofChineseEnglishmajors，throughtheobservationofth

2、eirargumentativeessays(Wen&Liu，2006；Chai，2009)．Thisstudy,undertheguidanceofPragrna-dialecticsandTuolmin’Srhetoricalargumentationtheory,identifiesthereasoningfallaciesandtheircausesinEnglishmajors’argumentativeessays，toexplorethestickingpointof“lackofthoughf’．Pragma．dialectics，aimin

3、gatabetterresolutionofthetwoparties’conflictsinanargumentation，shedslightonourunderstandingofstudents’reasoningfallacies，forthetheoryproposedTenCommandmentsthetwopartiesshouldabideby,whoseviolationleadstocorrespondingreasoningfallacies．GiventhecharactersofChineseEnglishmajors’argum

4、entativeessays，Pragmaodialectics’fourstagesinarguingandTenCommandmentsaremodifiedasthreestagesandsevencommandments．Toulmin’Smodel，foritsfullylayoutof6·elementreasoningprocess，helpsUStoidentifyhowthestudentsobservethecommandmentsorviolatethemandthusproducefallacies．Thisstudytakes150

5、EnglishargumentativeessaysasdataanddisplaystheirreasoningprocessesaccordingtOToulmin’Smodel．Byobservingthecommandmentabidance．weidentifiestwelvetypesoffallaciesinsevengroups：(1)concemingstandpoint：strawmanfallacy；(2)concerningtherelevanceofargumentation：patheticfallacyandirrelevant

6、argumentationfallacy；(3)concerningunexpressedpremise：denyinganunexpressedpremisefallacy；(4)concerningstartingpointoftheargumentation：circularreasoningfallacy；(5)concerningargumentscheme：appealloirrelevantauthorityfallacy，faultyanalogyfallacyandhastygeneralizationfallacy；(6)concerni

7、ngthevalidityoftheargumentation：compositionfallacyanddivisionfallacy；(7)concerningtheusageoflanguage：unclearnessfallacyandambiguityfallacy．Ineveryfallacy,thisstudyalsoanalyzesthecauseandtentativelysuggestssomemeasllrestoavoidthesefallacieS．KEYWORDS：argumentation；Pragma-dialectics；r

8、hetoricalargumentation；fal