资源描述:
《Discourse A Critical Introduction.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、DilemmasofDiscourse(Analysis)Discourse:ACriticalIntroductionbyJanBlommaert;AnIntroductiontoDiscourseAnalysis:TheoryandMethodbyJamesPaulGee;DiscoursebySaraMills;IntroductiontoDiscourseStudiesbyJanRenkema;Text,Context,Pretext:CriticalIssuesinDiscourseAn
2、alysisbyHenryG.WiddowsonReviewby:RuthWodakLanguageinSociety,Vol.35,No.4(Sep.,2006),pp.595-611Publishedby:CambridgeUniversityPressStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4169524.Accessed:30/03/201223:14YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceofthe
3、Terms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jspJSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnol
4、ogyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org.CambridgeUniversityPressiscollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoLanguageinSociety.http://www.jstor.orgL
5、anguageinSociety35,595-611.PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmericaDOI:10.1017/S004740450606026XREVIEWFOCUS:BOUNDARIESINDISCOURSEANALYSISDiscourseanalystscomefromavarietyofintellectualtraditions(systemic-functionallinguistics,Americandescriptivelinguistics,e
6、thnomethodology,andcriticaltheoryamongthem)andworkinavarietyofways.Asaresult,thereisrecurringdiscussionamongpractitionersabouttheboundariesthatconstitutediscourseanalysisasafield/theory/methodinrelationtootherfields/theories/methods.Thefollowingreview
7、salltakeupthisdiscussionintreatmentsofdis-courseanalysisinrecenttextbooksandotherprogrammaticwork.Readersshouldnotethatthiscollectionistheresultofhappyeditorialcoincidence-RuthWodakproposedareviewarticlethatcametopressaboutthesametimeasotherbookreview
8、sfittingthisthemearrivedatLiS.Itisnottheresultofasystematicat-tempttocoverthefield,whichwouldrequirethekindofintellectualboundary-workthesereviewsreportonandrepresent.BarbaraJohnstone,EditorREVIEWARTICLELanguageinSociety35(2006).PrintedintheUn