欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:34400697
大小:384.72 KB
页数:6页
时间:2019-03-05
《糖尿病多支冠状动脉病变患者不同血管重建疗效的比较》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、万方数据I临床心血管病杂志2007年7月第23卷第7期糖尿病多支冠状动脉病变患者不同血管重建疗效的比较*黎旭1顾承雄2刘晓惠1聂绍平1杜昕1黄方炯2周玉杰1陈方1吕强1康俊平1董建增1吕树铮1吴学思1马长生1·519·[摘要]目的:评价对糖尿病多支冠状动脉病变患者的裸支架(BMS)置入、药物洗脱支架(DES)置入和冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)3种不同血管重建的疗效。方法:选择接受血管重建治疗的糖尿病伴多支冠状动脉病变患者427例,比较其BMS、DES和CABG不同治疗方法的疗效和随访2年的临床结果。结果:BMS、DES和CABG3组间住
2、院时期的不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义。2年随访结果中,BMS组、DES组再次血管重建率分别为17.6%、10.4%,均显著高于CABG组的1.9%(P<0.01);BMS组的总MACCE发生率为23.1%,显著高于CABG组的10.7%(P3、分类号]R547.1[文献标志码]A[文章编号]1001—1439(2007)07—0519-04EvaluationofdifferentrevascularizationstrategiesindiabeticpatientswithmultivesselabnormalitiesLjX能1L工UXiaohuilNIEShaopin91DUXinlLVQian91KANGJunpin91DONGJianzeng1GUChengxiong2HU_ANGFangjlong2ZHOUYujie1CHENFang1LVShuzheng1WU4、Xuesi1MAChangsheng1(1DepartmentofCardiology,2DepartmentofHeartSurgery,BeijingAnzhenHospital,CapitalUniverstityofMedicalScience,Beijing,100029,China)AbstractObjective:Thestudyaimstoevaluatethreerevascularizationstrategies,includingbaremetalstent(BMS)implantation,drugeluti5、ngstent(DES)implantationandcoronaryarterybypasssurgery(CABG)indiabeticpatientswithmultivesselabnormalities.Method:Fourhundredandtwenty—sevenpatientswithdiabetesandmultivessdabnormalitieswhounderwenttherevascularizationinourinstitutionwereenrolledtocomparetheirclinicalout6、comesduringhospitalizationand2year{ollowupamongBMS,DESandCABGgroups.Result:Nosta—tisticaldifferencesarefoundintherateofin-hospitalmajoradversecardiacandcerebrovascularevents(MACCE)amongtheBMS,DESandCABGgroups.During2yearfollowup,therateofrepeatrevascularizationinBMSgroup7、was17.6%andMACCEwas23.1%,whichweremuchhigherthanthoseofDESandCABGgroups.TheriskofrepeatrevacularizationinBMSgroupwas16.858(95%CI4.079—69.677,P<0.01)timesthatoftheCABGgroup,andtheriskofMACCEis3,484(95%CI1.565—7.753,P<0.01)timesthatoftheCABGgroup.The2-yearfollowupevent—fre8、esurvivalofBMSgroupwasmuchlowerthanthatofCABGgroup.IntheDESgroup。therateofrepeatrevascularizationwas10.
3、分类号]R547.1[文献标志码]A[文章编号]1001—1439(2007)07—0519-04EvaluationofdifferentrevascularizationstrategiesindiabeticpatientswithmultivesselabnormalitiesLjX能1L工UXiaohuilNIEShaopin91DUXinlLVQian91KANGJunpin91DONGJianzeng1GUChengxiong2HU_ANGFangjlong2ZHOUYujie1CHENFang1LVShuzheng1WU
4、Xuesi1MAChangsheng1(1DepartmentofCardiology,2DepartmentofHeartSurgery,BeijingAnzhenHospital,CapitalUniverstityofMedicalScience,Beijing,100029,China)AbstractObjective:Thestudyaimstoevaluatethreerevascularizationstrategies,includingbaremetalstent(BMS)implantation,drugeluti
5、ngstent(DES)implantationandcoronaryarterybypasssurgery(CABG)indiabeticpatientswithmultivesselabnormalities.Method:Fourhundredandtwenty—sevenpatientswithdiabetesandmultivessdabnormalitieswhounderwenttherevascularizationinourinstitutionwereenrolledtocomparetheirclinicalout
6、comesduringhospitalizationand2year{ollowupamongBMS,DESandCABGgroups.Result:Nosta—tisticaldifferencesarefoundintherateofin-hospitalmajoradversecardiacandcerebrovascularevents(MACCE)amongtheBMS,DESandCABGgroups.During2yearfollowup,therateofrepeatrevascularizationinBMSgroup
7、was17.6%andMACCEwas23.1%,whichweremuchhigherthanthoseofDESandCABGgroups.TheriskofrepeatrevacularizationinBMSgroupwas16.858(95%CI4.079—69.677,P<0.01)timesthatoftheCABGgroup,andtheriskofMACCEis3,484(95%CI1.565—7.753,P<0.01)timesthatoftheCABGgroup.The2-yearfollowupevent—fre
8、esurvivalofBMSgroupwasmuchlowerthanthatofCABGgroup.IntheDESgroup。therateofrepeatrevascularizationwas10.
此文档下载收益归作者所有