legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学

legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学

ID:33190975

大小:123.00 KB

页数:26页

时间:2019-02-21

legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学_第1页
legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学_第2页
legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学_第3页
legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学_第4页
legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学_第5页
资源描述:

《legal positivism - brown university法律实证主义-布朗大学》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在应用文档-天天文库

1、LegalPositivismH.L.A.Hartistheleadinglegalphilosopherofthe20thCentury.Hisformulationofthecoreclaimsoflegalpositivismhasprovidedthefocalpointforboththemajordevelopmentsinthetheoryandthemostimportantcriticismsofit.ThefullestaccountofHart’sviewispresentedintheclassic,TheConcep

2、tofLaw.InmanywayshisaccountisarticulatedinresponsetovariousshortcomingsheidentifiedinAustin’saccount.Austinisassociatedwiththeclaimthatthe‘keytothescienceofjurisprudence’liesintheclaimthatthe‘lawistheorderorcommandbackedbyathreatofasovereignproperlyso-called.’Thekeyconcepts

3、inAustin’saccountarecommands,sanctions,habitsofobedience(orcompliance)andthesovereign(notsovereignty).Hartarguedthattheseresourcesareinadequatetoexplainimportantaspectsofthetemporalandnormativedimensionsoflaw.Hartnotedtheobviousfactthatlawstypicallysurvivethesovereignwhoiss

4、uesthem,andthatthedirectivesofnewlyminted‘sovereigns’arelaw.NeitherfeatureoflawcanbeunderstoodwithintheAustinianframework.Thesovereignisthatpersonwhoisnotinthehabitofobeyingthedirectivesofothersandwhohimselfhassecuredthehabitofobedienceofothers,andsoasovereignisadefiniteper

5、son,nottheofficethatdifferentpersonsoccupy.Whenthesovereigndiessotoodohis‘laws.’Forthesamereasons,thefirstcommandofsomeonecannotbelawforthatindividualhasnotyetsecuredtherequisitehabitofobedience.Infact,however,thefirstdirectivesofauthorizedlegislaturesarelawpriortothepopula

6、tiondisplayingobediencetothem,andthedirectivesofauthorizedbodiesremainlawaftertheirdeparturefrom‘office.’Inanutshell,theproblemwiththeAustinianaccountisthattheexistenceofahabitofobedienceisinadequatetoexplaintheconceptof‘authorization’or‘authority’thatiscentraltoourundersta

7、ndingoflaw.Hart’sobjectionstotheAustinianaccountofwhatwemightcallthenormativeaspectsoflawwereequallydevastating,butintheendmoreimportanttothedevelopmentoflegalpositivismandvariousmodernalternativestoit.Thestructureoftheargumentisthesame.Lawsregulaterelationsamongindividuals

8、byimposingobligationsandconferringrights,privileges,powersandimmunities.Thelanguag

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。