“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释

“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释

ID:32234455

大小:1.97 MB

页数:39页

时间:2019-02-02

“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释_第1页
“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释_第2页
“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释_第3页
“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释_第4页
“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释_第5页
资源描述:

《“解释学循环”视角下文学解读的有效性与过度诠释》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、⑨硕士学位论文MASTER’STHESISAbstractThehermeneuticcircleisallextremelyimportantconceptinhermeneutics,accordingtothecontentitCallbedividedintopre-classicalformsofHeideggerandhismodemformafter.InthisPaper,theevolutionoftheconceptofthehermeneuticcirclefromancienttimestillnowhascarriedonclosecombing,inpart

2、icular,inspectedinAst,Schleiermacher,Dilthey,HeideggerandGadamer'shermeneuticalcirclethinking.Although110clearexplanationofAncientChineseScienceofreference,butithasarichhermeneuticthinking.TllispaperdiscussedbyMenciusrepresentedthe”inferringwillfrommeaning”and”reflectionoflife”thehermeneuticalci

3、rclethought,hopingtofindsimilarlinkswiththe胎st'sspiritualresources。andprovideatheoreticalreferenceaboutthatthequestionofinterpretationofliterature.Fromthetextandthetextwithinthehermeneuticcircleaproblemarisingoutisthevalidityofinterpretation.Initiallyonthevalidityofinterpretationispresentedoutby

4、theUIlitedStatesandliteraryHirsch,whohadadetaileddiscussioni11hisbookValidity伽Interpretation.Juhltheoristshavegonefurther,explicitlythat’’aworkthatonlyasinglecorrectinterpretation”ofpointoftheviewtomaintaintheliteraryinterpretationofthescientificandobjective.Over-interpretationoftherealproblemis

5、derivedfromtheinterpretationofthevaliditycomes,itWasfirstusedbytheItaliansemioticianUmbertoEcoproposedinthe1990s.Compiledandpublishedinthe"InterpretationandOver-interpretation”ofacollectionofUmbertoEco,RichardRortyandJonathanCuller's1ecture,wereeachsetoutontheissueofover-interpretationofitsownpo

6、sitionandviews.TlliSthesisonathoroughanalysisoneachofthepointsofDiscriminationandsortofthoughtsinorderonthisissuetoknowmore.TIliSarticledeemedthatthedistinctionbetweenmeaningandsignificantisveryimportant,whichCanhelpUSrecognizethatdifferentinterpretationsofthetextliesthetheoreticaldifferences.Bu

7、tonJohl’S”theonlycorrectinterpretationofaworkonly'’viewistllatsometoofar.Over-interpretationontheissue,agreedthatUmbertoEco011thesourceofover-interpretationofthehistorytracking,andCuller’Sclaimontheoperatingmechanismofthetex

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。