资源描述：
《两种麻醉方法对老年高血压患者下肢关节置换术中心血管功能影响的研究 (1)》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、徐州医学院硕士学位论文atdifferenttimepoints.Drawarterialbloodspecimen5mlfromtheradialarterial
catheteratT0,T2,T7andT8watchpointsrespectively.Fillitinadisposablesampling
tube（modelSSTⅡ,plastic,silicifiedintine,withcoagulantandserumseparationgel,
BectonDickensonCo,UK）andshelveitonthetest-tubestandfortw
2、ohoursatroom
temperature.Andthencentrifugatethesampletubeatarateof1000revolutionsper
minutefor10mininthecentrifugalmachine（model80-2,Shanghaioperational
apparatusmanufactory）toseparateserum.Later,theserumspecimenswerequicklyand
scrupulouslycollectedintoaminiatureserumsetter,andstoredintheu
3、ltralow
temperaturerefrigerator(-80℃,model702,ThermoCo,Am)waitingformassed
serologictest.Peri-operativecomplicationsandadverseevents,suchasintra-operative
myocardialischemia,myocardialinfarction,hypotension,hypertension,arrhythmia,
deepvenousthrombosisoflowerlimbs（intravenousangiography）,p
4、ulmonary
embolism（intravenousangiography）wererecorded.Compareandanalyzethe
hemodynamicparametervaluesandserumconcentrationofhighsensitivityC-reactivity
proteinbetweenthetwogroups.Results①AtT1，HR,SVR,SVRIingroupAincreasedmarkedly,whileSABP、
DABP、MAP、RPPsignificantlyhigherthanthoseofgroupB.I
5、nmosttimeduringthe
operation,SABP、DABP、MAP、RPP、SVR、SVRIingroupAweresignificantlyhigher
thanthoseofgroupB(p<0.05).②FromT1toT8,SABP、DABP、MAP、RPPingroup
Bweresignificantlylowerthanthecontrolvalue.AtT3,T4andT6~T8,SVR、SVRI
decreasedpronouncedly,andweresignificantlylowerthanthoseingroupA.③After
6、T5,HRdecreasedmarkedlytobelowcontrolvalueinbothgroups.④FromT1toT8,
CVPingroupAweresignificantlyhigherthanthecontrolvalue,whileonlyatT1and
T2ingroupB.⑤TherewasaprominentdecreaseinCOandCIingroupAatT8,and
ingroupBatT2,T3.AtT7andT8,COandCIingroupBwerenoticeablyhigherthan
thoseofgroupA.⑥Ingroup
7、B,SVatT6，SVVatT6andT7increasedsignificantly,
whileSVIatT6increasedhighlysignificantly.SVvariationingroupBatT6was
significantlylower.AtT1,SVvariationwasstrikingenoughtobeyondnormalrangein
bothgroups.⑦Atothertimepoints,therewasnoobviousdifferenceincross-refer
co
