预见性告知护理对改善突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者焦虑状态的效果观察

《预见性告知护理对改善突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者焦虑状态的效果观察》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。

1、预见性告知护理对改善突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者焦虑状态的效果观察［摘要］H的？〃环（12）远?聋伴耳鸣患者接受预见性告知护理并对对其焦虑状态的影响进行分析。方法选取2015年1月〜2016年3月突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者100例，依据简单随机化法分为两组，两组均给予氧疗、抗病毒、改善微循环等药物治疗及常规健康教育，实验组则在以上基础上接受预见性告知护理，比较两组突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者干预后焦虑改善情况、疗效以及护理满意度。结果实验组突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者干预后的SCL-90症状自评量表评分明显低于对照组（P〈0.05）;实验组突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患

2、者干预后的气导听阈值水平明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;实验组治疗的有效率（88.00%）明显高于对照组的70.00%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;实验组对护理的总满意度（96.00%）明显高于对照组的84.00%，差异有统计学意义（1X0.05）。结论突发性耳聋伴耳鸣患者接受预见性告知护理，不仅可以促进其焦虑症状的改善，同时可以提高治疗的疗效以及对护理的满意程度，应用价值较高。本文采集自网络，本站发布的论文均是优质论文，供学习和研宄使用，文中立场与本网站无关，版权和著作权归原作者所右，如存不愿意被转载的

3、情况，请通知我们删除己转载的信息，如果需要分享，请保留本段说明。［关键词］突发性耳聋伴耳鸣；预见性告知护理；焦虑；气导听阈值;满意度［中图分类号］R473.76［文献标识码］B［文章编号］1673-9701(2017)03-0150-03EffectofpredictingnursinginimprovinganxietystateinpatientswithsuddendeafnessandtinnitusLIUYanLIUHuiqiaoTAOJingDepartmentofENT,LishuiPeople’sHospital

4、inZhejiangProvince，Lishui323000,China［Abstract］ObjectiveToinvestigatetheeffectofpredictingnursingontheanxietyofpatientswithsuddendeafnessandtinnitus.MethodsAtotalof100casesofsuddendeafnesswithtinnitusfromJanuary2015toMarch2016wereselectedanddividedintotwogroupsbysimp

5、lerandomization.Thetwogroupswerebothgivenmedicaltreatmentincludingoxygentherapy,anti-virus，improvingmicrocirculationetc.androutinehealtheducation,andtheexperimentalgroupreceivedpredictingnursingonthebasisoftheabove.Thedifferenceinanxietyimprovement,curativeeffectandn

6、ursingsatisfactionofpatientswithsuddendeafnessandtinnitusafterinterventionwerecompared.ResultsThescoreofself-ratingsymptomscaleSCL-90intheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup(P〈0.05).Thelevelofairconductionthresholdintheexperimentalgrouppat

7、ientswithsuddendeafnessandtinnituswassignificantlylowerthanthatthaninthecontrolgroup(P<0.05).Theeffectiverate(88.00%)oftheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofthecontrolgroup(70.00%),andthedifferencewassignificantbetweentwogroups(P〈0.05).Thetotalsatisfact

8、ion(96.00%)intheexperimentalgroupwassignificantlyhigherthanthatinthecontrolgroup(84.00%),thedifferencewassignificantbetweentwogroup