择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析

择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析

ID:23605285

大小:2.80 MB

页数:43页

时间:2018-11-09

择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析_第1页
择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析_第2页
择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析_第3页
择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析_第4页
择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析_第5页
资源描述:

《择期pci对比急诊pci比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、授予单位代码10089学号或申请号20153135专业代码R541.4HebeiMedicalUniversity硕士学位论文专业学位择期PCI对比急诊PCI比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析研究生:刘玉龙导师:王梅教授专业:内科学二级学院:河北医科大学第二医院2018年3月目录中文摘要·····································································································10英文摘要·······································

2、·······························································20研究论文择期PCI对比急诊PCI比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析前言·····································································································40资料与方法··················································································

3、·····50结果··········································································································6附图··········································································································09附表·······························································

4、···········································23讨论··········································································································25结论··········································································································28参考文献······················

5、············································································28综述经皮冠脉介入治疗术中应用比伐卢定的研究进展····························33致谢··················································································································38个人简历······································

6、····································································39中文摘要择期PCI对比急诊PCI比伐卢定有效性及安全性的meta分析摘要目的:系统评价急性冠脉综合征患者行择期PCI对比急诊PCI比伐卢定的有效性及安全性。背景:目前,对于行PCI术的急性冠脉综合征患者,术中最佳抗凝策略仍然存在争议,更为重要的是,对比急诊PCI,择期PCI时应用比伐卢定的有效性及安全性研究鲜有报道。方法:文献检索主要在PubMed,EMBASE,CochraneLibrary,ClinicalTrials数据库中,采用R

7、evMan5.3软件进行数据统计学处理,根据患者是否常规应用GPIIb/Ⅲa拮抗剂(GPI)进行亚组分析。结果:最终,我们共纳入13项随机对照研究,共包括23500名患者。在急诊PCI患者中,比伐卢定显著降低患者30d内全因死亡(RR0.80;295%CI0.67to0.96;P=0.02;I=0%)、心源性死亡(RR0.76;95%CI0.59to20.98;P=0.04;I=0%)以及30d内严重出血风险(RR0.61;95%CI0.44to20.83;P=0.002,I=70%),但是却增加患者心

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。