资源描述:
《institutions and economic growth in historical perspective 1 what do we learn from schumpeterian growth theory》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在工程资料-天天文库。
1、CHAPTEREIGHTInstitutionsandEconomicGrowthinHistoricalPerspectiveSheilaghOgilvieandA.W.CarusFacultyofEconomics,UniversityofCambridge,UnitedKingdomAbstractThischaptersurveysthehistoricalevidenceontheroleofinstitutionsineconomicgrowthandpointsoutweaknessesinanumberofstylized
2、factswidelyacceptedinthegrowthliterature.Itshowsthatprivate-orderinstitutionshavenothistoricallysubstitutedforpublic-orderonesinenablingmarketstofunction;thatparliamentsrepresentingwealthholdershavenotinvariablybeenfavorableforgrowth;andthattheGloriousRevolutionof1688inEn
3、glanddidnotmarkthesuddenemergenceofeithersecurepropertyrightsoreconomicgrowth.Economichistoryhasbeenusedtosupportboththecentralityandtheirrelevanceofsecurepropertyrightstogrowth,butthereasonforthisisconceptualvagueness.Securepropertyrightsrequiremuchmorecarefulanalysis,di
4、stinguishingbetweenrightsofownership,use,andtransfer,andbetweengeneralizedandparticularizedvariants.Similarcarefulanal-ysiswould,weargue,clarifythegrowtheffectsofotherinstitutions,includingcontract-enforcementmechanisms,guilds,communities,serfdom,andthefamily.Greaterprecis
5、ionconcerninginstitutionaleffectsongrowthcanbeachievedbydevelopingsharpercriteriaofapplicationforconventionalinstitutionallabels,endowinginstitutionswithascaleofintensityordegree,andrecognizingthattheeffectsofeachinstitutiondependonitsrelationshipwithothercomponentsofthewid
6、erinstitutionalsystem.KeywordsInstitutions,Economicgrowth,Economichistory,Private-orderinstitutions,Public-orderinstitutions,Parliaments,Propertyrights,Contractenforcement,Guilds,Serfdom,Thefamily,Maghribitraders,ChampagnefairsJELClassificationCodesN01,N03,N04,N07,O17,P00,
7、N058.1.INTRODUCTIONTheliteratureoneconomicgrowth,oldandnew,restsonwide-rangingandoftenunexaminedhistoricalassumptions,whichthereforeraisemanyfundamentalquestions.Whereandwhendideconomiesdevelopthethresholdlevelsofpropertyrightsandmarketfunctioningwhichneoclassicalgrowthmo
8、delsimplicitlyassumetobemet(Aron,2000)?Whataretheinstitutionaloriginsoftheasymmetriesbetweensect