资源描述:
《Deductive-reasoning-vs-Inductive-reasoning-2011-8-25-归纳和演绎课件.ppt》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库。
1、LegalReasoning:DeductiveReasoningV.InductiveReasoning“Everylegalanalysisshouldbeginatthepointofreason,continuealongapathoflogicandarriveatafundamentallyfairresult.”DouglasLindAwell-knowncartoonaboutjudicialreasoningisillustrative.Ninedistinguishedjudgesi
2、nrobessitinarowbehindahighrostrum.Solemnexpressionsgracetheirfaces,andonejudgeisreadingfromapieceofpaper."Mydissentingopinionwillbebrief,"hesays."You'reallfullofcrap."Case1A:Allmenaremortal.B:Socratesisaman.C:______________.?Question:Whatreasoningisused
3、inthiscase?A,BandCcanbetitledas____,____,and_____.KeytoCase1DeductiveReasoning:Majorpremise:Allmenaremortal.MinorPremise:Socratesisaman.Conclusion:Socratesismortal.Attention:Ifweuseinductivereasoninghere,therewouldbeaninvalidapplicationifoneconcluded“Ther
4、efore,Socratesisallmen”Case2-DeductiveReasoningMajorPremise:Afoothasfivetoes.MinorPremise:Thedistanceisonefoot.Conclusion:Thedistanceisfivetoes.Question:What’syourcommentonit?KeytoCase2Asyllogismmayproduceaninvalidconclusionwhenthemeaningofwordsischangedf
5、romthemajorpremisetotheminorpremise.Case3-LegalDeductiveReasoningRule:CarryingaConcealedPistolisaFelony.Facts:Arenaswascarryingaconcealedpistol.LegalConclusion:Arenascommittedafelony.Case4-LegalDeductiveReasoningRule:Tobeenforceable,acontractforthesaleofg
6、oodsforapriceof$500ormoremustbeinwriting.Facts:Theoralcontractforthesaleofthesegoodswasnotfor$500ormore.Legalconclusion:Thecontractinthiscasewasenforceable.Case5-LegalDeductiveReasoningRule:Theownerofpropertywhichhasbeenstolenfromhimisentitledtorecoverthe
7、propertyfromabonafidepurchaserfromthethief,butmaynotrecoverthepropertyfromabonafidepurchaserfromapersonwhoobtainedpropertyfromtheownerbyfraudulentinducementFacts:DefendantHalewasabonafidepurchaserfromAbbott,whoobtainedthepropertyfromtheowner,Costello,byme
8、ansoffraudulentinducementLegalConclusion:Costello,theowner,cannotrecoverthepropertyfromHale.SummaryofDeductiveReasoningDerivesitsconclusionbyreasoningfromthemajor(i.e.,general)premisetotheminor(i.e.,particular)premi