欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:55684504
大小:543.32 KB
页数:3页
时间:2020-05-24
《腹部CT、B超及核磁胰胆管成像在肝外胆管结石的诊断价值分析.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、学术论著中国医学装备2014年6月第1l卷第6期ChinaMedicalEquipment2014JuneVo1.11NO.6腹部CT、B超及核磁胰胆管成像在肝外胆管结石的诊断价值分析周蓉①张勇②[文章编号]1672—8270(20l4)06—0076—03[中图分类号]R445.2[文献标识码]A[摘要】目的:对比分析腹部CT、B超及核磁共振成像(MRI)胰胆管成像3种不同方法检测肝外胆管结石的影像特征。方法:随机抽取肝外胆管结石病例样本150例作为研究对象,患者于内镜下逆行胰胆管造影确诊后,依次实施B超、CT扫描及MRI成像术。142例行B超检测,78例行CT检测
2、,l18例行MRI检测。记录和比较3种成像方法的检出结果。结果:肝外胆管结石阳性检出率,B超为39.4%、CT为53.8%、MRI为86.4%,MRI阳性检出率明显高于B超和CT,差异有统计学意义=59.725,x=25.595;P3、情况、经济状况及症状主诉等综合评价,选择较为适宜的方法进行诊断。作者简介[关键词】核磁胰胆管成像,肝外胆管结石,诊断价值DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2014.06.025周蓉,女,(1968-),大专,主治医师。广元AnalysisondiagnosticvalueofabdominalCT,Bultrasoundandmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinbileductstones/ZHOURong,ZHANGYong/4、ChinaMedical市中医医院功能检查Equipment,205、14,11(6):76-78.科.从事超声诊断工[LA--b-stract]0bjective:ComparativeanalvsisofimagingfeaturesofabdominalCT,Bultrasoundandmagneticresonancaclangiopancatograph—yi—nthreediferentmethodsfordetection¨。ofextrahepaticbileductstones.Methods:Arandomsampleofextrahepaticbileductstoneswereasampleof150casesa6、stheobjectofstudy,patientsintheendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyafterdiagnosis,followedbyBultrasoundexamination.theimplementationofCTscanningandMRIimagingin142cases.including78casesofBultrasounddetection,CTdetection,118casesunderwentMRIexamination.Results:Thedetectionresultsw7、ererecordedandcomparedthe3imagingmethods.Results:ThepositiverateofBultrasound39.4%.thepositiverateofCTwas53.8%,MRIpositiveratewas86.4%thepositiverateofMR1wassignificantlyhigherthanthatofBultrasoundandCT=59.725,=25.595;P<0.011,thedetectionrateofCTwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofBultrasou8、nd(x=4-231,P
3、情况、经济状况及症状主诉等综合评价,选择较为适宜的方法进行诊断。作者简介[关键词】核磁胰胆管成像,肝外胆管结石,诊断价值DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2014.06.025周蓉,女,(1968-),大专,主治医师。广元AnalysisondiagnosticvalueofabdominalCT,Bultrasoundandmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatographyinbileductstones/ZHOURong,ZHANGYong/
4、ChinaMedical市中医医院功能检查Equipment,20
5、14,11(6):76-78.科.从事超声诊断工[LA--b-stract]0bjective:ComparativeanalvsisofimagingfeaturesofabdominalCT,Bultrasoundandmagneticresonancaclangiopancatograph—yi—nthreediferentmethodsfordetection¨。ofextrahepaticbileductstones.Methods:Arandomsampleofextrahepaticbileductstoneswereasampleof150casesa
6、stheobjectofstudy,patientsintheendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyafterdiagnosis,followedbyBultrasoundexamination.theimplementationofCTscanningandMRIimagingin142cases.including78casesofBultrasounddetection,CTdetection,118casesunderwentMRIexamination.Results:Thedetectionresultsw
7、ererecordedandcomparedthe3imagingmethods.Results:ThepositiverateofBultrasound39.4%.thepositiverateofCTwas53.8%,MRIpositiveratewas86.4%thepositiverateofMR1wassignificantlyhigherthanthatofBultrasoundandCT=59.725,=25.595;P<0.011,thedetectionrateofCTwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofBultrasou
8、nd(x=4-231,P
此文档下载收益归作者所有