欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:55609648
大小:688.99 KB
页数:5页
时间:2020-05-18
《痛风性关节炎的X线、CT和MRI诊断价值比较.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、中国l临床医学影像杂志2015年第26卷第7期JChinClinMedImaging,2015,Vo1.26,No.7·523·痛风性关节炎的X线、CT和MRI诊断价值比较漆强,邹玉林,余晖,刘晓,李志娟(东莞东华医院放射科,广东东莞523110)【摘要】目的:比较x线、CT和MRI检查对痛风性关节炎的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析56例痛风性关节炎患者共112个患病关节的x线、CT和MRI影像资料,采用卡方检验对比分析3种检查方法的检出率及对不同病变的显示率。结果:X线、CT、MRI检查的检出率分别为53%(5
2、9/112)、74%(83/112)、88%(99/112),MRI高于CT、X线(×=7.502,P=0.006;X2=34.369,P<0.001)。X线显示痛风结节、关节面下囊变的关节个数少于MRI(x=24.605,P3、韧带侵蚀、关节软骨侵蚀、关节积液和关节周围肌间隙水肿的关节个数均少于MRI(x=19.790,P<0.001;x=l1.568,P<0.001;X2=13.297,P<0.001;x=6.720,P=0.01)。结论:X线、CT和MR1对痛风性关节炎均有较好的诊断能力,其中MRI检查总的检出率较高、发现病变的能力较好,CT检查则对痛风结节具有较高的特异性,而x线适用于中晚期患者的复查对照。【关键词】关节炎,痛风性;放射摄影术;体层摄影术,螺旋计算机;磁共振成像[中图分类号】R684-3;R814.41;R814、4.42;R445.2[文献标识码】A【文章编号】1008—1062(2015)07—0523—05ComparisonofX—ray.CTandMRimagingingoutyarthritisQIQiang,ZOUYu—lin.YUHui,LIUXiao.LIZhi-ju帆TheRadiologicalDepartmentofDongguanTungWattHospital,DongguanGuangdong523110,China)Abstract:0bjective:Tocomparethediagn5、osisvalueofX—ray,CTandMRIimagingingoutyarthritis.Methods:Aret—rospectivestudywasperformedin112symptomicjointof56patientswithgoutyarthritis.TheimagesofX-ray,CTandMR1werecollected.TheChi—squaretestwasusedtocomparethediagnosisabilityofX—ray。CTandMRI.Results:Th6、ediagnosticpositiverateofX—ray,CTandMR1were53%(59/112),74%(83/112)and88%(99/112)respectively.MR1wassuperiortox—rayandcT()(:7.502,P=0.006;x=34.369,P<0.001).X—raywasi~eriortoCT(x=18.576,P<0.001;x=13.069,P<0.001)andMRI(X2=24.605,P<0.001;x=31.112,P<0.001)infind7、ingatophusjointandcysticrelevantsectionunderthesurfaceofthejoints.TherewasnosignificantdiferencebetweenCTandMRIinfindingatophusjointandcysticrelevantsectionundertheSurfaceofthejoints(x=0.466,P=-0.495;x=3.211,P=0.073).However,MR1wassuperiortoCTinfindingsynov8、ialthick—eningandligamenterosion,cartilageerosion,jointeffusionandmuscleedemaaroundthejointgap(XZ=19.790,P<0.001;X2=11.568,P<0.001;x:13.297,P<0.001;x=6.720,P=-0.01).Conclusion:X—ray,CTandMRIallcouldbeu
3、韧带侵蚀、关节软骨侵蚀、关节积液和关节周围肌间隙水肿的关节个数均少于MRI(x=19.790,P<0.001;x=l1.568,P<0.001;X2=13.297,P<0.001;x=6.720,P=0.01)。结论:X线、CT和MR1对痛风性关节炎均有较好的诊断能力,其中MRI检查总的检出率较高、发现病变的能力较好,CT检查则对痛风结节具有较高的特异性,而x线适用于中晚期患者的复查对照。【关键词】关节炎,痛风性;放射摄影术;体层摄影术,螺旋计算机;磁共振成像[中图分类号】R684-3;R814.41;R81
4、4.42;R445.2[文献标识码】A【文章编号】1008—1062(2015)07—0523—05ComparisonofX—ray.CTandMRimagingingoutyarthritisQIQiang,ZOUYu—lin.YUHui,LIUXiao.LIZhi-ju帆TheRadiologicalDepartmentofDongguanTungWattHospital,DongguanGuangdong523110,China)Abstract:0bjective:Tocomparethediagn
5、osisvalueofX—ray,CTandMRIimagingingoutyarthritis.Methods:Aret—rospectivestudywasperformedin112symptomicjointof56patientswithgoutyarthritis.TheimagesofX-ray,CTandMR1werecollected.TheChi—squaretestwasusedtocomparethediagnosisabilityofX—ray。CTandMRI.Results:Th
6、ediagnosticpositiverateofX—ray,CTandMR1were53%(59/112),74%(83/112)and88%(99/112)respectively.MR1wassuperiortox—rayandcT()(:7.502,P=0.006;x=34.369,P<0.001).X—raywasi~eriortoCT(x=18.576,P<0.001;x=13.069,P<0.001)andMRI(X2=24.605,P<0.001;x=31.112,P<0.001)infind
7、ingatophusjointandcysticrelevantsectionunderthesurfaceofthejoints.TherewasnosignificantdiferencebetweenCTandMRIinfindingatophusjointandcysticrelevantsectionundertheSurfaceofthejoints(x=0.466,P=-0.495;x=3.211,P=0.073).However,MR1wassuperiortoCTinfindingsynov
8、ialthick—eningandligamenterosion,cartilageerosion,jointeffusionandmuscleedemaaroundthejointgap(XZ=19.790,P<0.001;X2=11.568,P<0.001;x:13.297,P<0.001;x=6.720,P=-0.01).Conclusion:X—ray,CTandMRIallcouldbeu
此文档下载收益归作者所有