资源描述:
《gmat cr填空例题分析》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、www.gmatonline.cn填空题型及例题分析【填空题】填空题,又称blank题型。通常需要通过理解题目语义,在划线部分填上一个最符合题意的部分。标志性特征:划线部分。一般来说(1)空格前是since,because则是假设题;(2)空格前是therefore,hence,thus是MUSTBETRUE/MainPoint题。解题技巧:1、填原因:同解释题做法2、题型:(1)A,thereforeB填写AB之间的Gap架桥(2)A,howeverB填写A的直接原因与解释题做法相同例题:PG13-P
2、503-12Whichofthefollowingmostlogicallycompletesthepassage?Mostbicyclehelmetsprovidegoodprotectionforthetopandbackofthehead,butlittleornoprotectionforthetempleregionsonthesidesofthehead.Astudyofheadinjuriesresultingfrombicycleaccidentsshowedthatalargeprop
3、ortionwerecausedbyblowstothetemplearea.Therefore,ifbicyclehelmetsprotectedthisarea,theriskofseriousheadinjuryinbicycleaccidentswouldbegreatlyreduced,especiallysince.(A)amongthebicyclistsincludedinthestudy'ssampleofheadinjuries,onlyaverysmallproportionhad
4、beenwearingahelmetatthetimeoftheiraccident(B)eventhosebicyclistswhoregularlywearhelmetshaveapoorunderstandingofthedegreeandkindofprotectionthathelmetsafford(C)ahelmetthatincludedprotectionforthetempleswouldhavetobesomewhatlargerandheavierthancurrenthelme
5、ts(D)theboneinthetempleareaisrelativelythinandimpactsinthatareaarethusverylikelytocausebraininjurywww.gmatonline.cn(E)bicyclistsgenerallylandontheirarmorshoulderwhentheyfalltotheside,whichreducesthelikelihoodofsevereimpactsonthesideofthehead解析:题干:大部分的自行车
6、头盔都为头顶和后脑提供良好的保护,但是却忽视了头两侧太阳穴部位。一项针对自行车事故头部损伤的研究表明其中的一大部分是出自太阳穴部位损伤。所以,如果自行车头盔保护该区域的话,自行车事故头部严重受伤的风险将大大降低,因为________A,质疑了研究的准确性,错误。B,骑车的人对头盔保护作用认识不够,混淆了关键对象。C,保护太阳穴部位的头盔会更大更重,引入无关属性。D,指出了太阳穴部位本身就很脆弱,是我们要找的关键对象的关键属性。正确!E,指出太阳穴部位不易受伤,逻辑方向错误。例题:OG16-P515-43
7、Whichofthechoicesmostlogicallycompletesthefollowingargument?NowNews,althoughstillthemostpopularmagazinecoveringculturaleventsinKalopolis,hasrecentlysufferedasignificantdropinadvertisingrevenuebecauseoffallingcirculation.Manyreadershavebegunbuyingacompeti
8、ngmagazinethat,at50centspercopy,costslessthanNowNewsat$1.50percopy.Inordertoboostcirculationandthusincreaseadvertisingrevenue,NowNews’spublisherhasproposedmakingitavailableatnocharge.However,thisproposalhasaseriousdrawback