A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf

A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf

ID:49865437

大小:81.30 KB

页数:11页

时间:2020-03-05

A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf_第1页
A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf_第2页
A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf_第3页
A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf_第4页
A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf_第5页
资源描述:

《A CRITIQUE OF SCHOPENHAUER’S METAPHYSIC.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在应用文档-天天文库

1、GermanLifeandLetters59:3July20060016–8777(print);1468–0483(online)ACRITIQUEOFSCHOPENHAUER’SMETAPHYSICG.A.WELLSABSTRACTSchopenhauer’smetaphysicisnotmorecrediblethanthesystemsofhiscontempo-rariesFichte,SchellingandHegel,allofwhomhecriticisedsoseverely.Butashiswritings,unliketheirs,aresolucid,theyill

2、ustrateveryclearlythemetaphysician’sendeavourtoreachknowledgethatisimmediateandindubitable,notmediatedbythesenseorgansandthebrain,asisknowledgeoftheexternalworld.Hearguesthat‘dasEinzigewirklichundunbedingtGegebeneistdasSelbstbewußtsein’,whichalonecanyield‘dieletztenundwichtigstenAufschlüsseüberdas

3、WesenderDinge’.Hehimselfwasnotreligious,butthisdoctrinehasappealedtotheologiansseekingabasisfortheirbeliefthatisindependentofexternal(historical)testimony.Inthisconnection,AlbertSchweitzerexpresslyurgedareturntotheGermanmetaphysicaltradition,inparticulartoSchopenhauer’sviewofthewillasthetranscende

4、ntrealityatthebasisofself-consciousness.Thepresentarticleargues,intheBritishempiricaltradition,thatthereisreallynoreasontodistinguishself-consciousnessandexperiencesattributabletowillfromotherkindsofexperience.Thepracticaldistinctionisthattheideaofselfdependslargelynotonthesensationsprovidedbyread

5、ilyobservablesensessuchassightandhearing,butonmuscular,articularandvisceralreceptorswhichconsti-tutealessaccessibleinternalsensorium.Schopenhauer’swritingsthrowmuchlightontheproblemsofmeta-physics,andonGermanmetaphysiciansandtheiroftenstrangespecula-tionsinparticular.Hedidnotexpecttobeunderstoodby

6、areallywidepublic,buthesoughttomakephilosophyasintelligibleaspossible,notbyremovingtheinherentdifficulties,butbyavoidingwhatheconsid-eredtobethelargemixtureofhocus-pocusinhisimmediatepredeces-sorsFichte,SchellingandHegel.Nevertheless,althoughhewrotesoclearly,hehasprovedmuchlessacceptabletothegener

7、alpublicthanHegel,manyofwhoseideashefoundquiteunintelligible.IntheprefacetothefirsteditionofhisDiebeidenGrundproblemederEthikheevenheldthathewouldbeperfectlyjustifiedwerehetosaythatanyonewhocouldreadHegel’smostac

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。