资源描述：
《国网江西省电力公司评标管理体系优化研究——以分宜县供电公司为例.pdf》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、ABSTRACTABSTRACTSincethe30Years’reformandopeningup,thetenderprocurementiswidelyusedinallareasandmakegreatachievements.However,somedeep-seatedproblemshaveexposedgradually.Especiallythekeypartinthebiddingmanagementistheevaluationmanagementsystemandstillneed
2、tooptimizetheevaluationwhichisthecorepartofthebidding,Evaluationofthemanagementisnotperfectonthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofpartiesbiddingactivitieswhichwillcausetoacertainextent.Inordertostandardizethebiddingbehavior,guaranteethepurchasingbehaviorfully
3、open,fair,andhighquality,efficient,economic,security,howtocarryoutthescientificandeffectivemanagementisveryimportanttotheevaluationsystem.Therefore,researchonthissubjecthasacertainapplicationvalue.Thisarticlefocusesonthethreeaspects:evaluationmethods,bide
4、valuationexpertsandexpertdatabasemanagementandtheriskevaluationmanagement.FromevaluationofthemanagementofStateGridJpowersupplycompanyproblemsandunderlyingcauses,usingthemethodofcombiningthetheorywithcaseanalysis,includingthecomparisonresearchmethod,litera
5、tureresearchmethod,surveymethod,statisticalanalysismethodandcaseanalysismethodwereanalyzed,combinedwithadvancedmanagementexperienceforevaluationreference,countermeasuresandsuggestionsputforwardtooptimizetheevaluationmanagementsystem.Thearticleisdividedint
6、o5chapters.Thefirstchapteristheintroduction;thesecondchapteristheevaluationofthemanagementandtherelatedtheory;thethirdchapteristhecurrentstatusanalysisofevaluationmanagementinJpowersupplycompany;thefourthchapteristheoverallstudyofbiddingevaluationmanageme
7、ntsystemoptimizationinJpowersuppplycompany,thefifthchapteristheconclusionandprospect.Inthisarticle,throughcasestudy,theevaluationmanagementsystemofJpowersupplycompanyisnotoptimized.Thereasonistheproblemofevaluationmanagementsystem.TakingStateGridYpowersup
8、plycompany(thesubsidiarycompanyunderStateGridJpowersupplycompany,hereinafterreferredtoasStateGridYpowersupplycompany)asanexample.ThefirstisevaluationmethodsarenotIIABSTRACTscientificenough;evaluationsystemisnotmatur
