资源描述:
《Inferentialism and Its Discontents英文》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、Chapter2InferentialismandItsDiscontentsAperennialquestioninconsiderationoflogicconcernswheretherulesoflogiccomefrom?Thisquestionisoverflowingwithsub-questionsregarding,forexample,whatismeantbytherulesoflogic;whetherornotweareconcernedwiththejustificationofrules,orthemean
2、ingfulnessofcertainrules,orboth(theseareoftenruntogether);howdoweunderstandtherelationshipbetweenlogicalrulesandtruth;whatisthenormativeroleoflogicalrules?Inthischapter,IprovideabriefoverviewofinferentialisminSect.2,beforegoingontoidentifyanumberofconcernsfrequentlymad
3、eagainstit.Section3developsthediscussionofthecircularityofjustifyinglogicalrulesthatIoutlinedintheintroduction.Theseproblemsarecompoundedbytheissuesraisedbyparadoxicalconnectivessuchas“tonk”,discussedinSect.4.Onesuggestionmadeintheliteratureistocombinetheinferentialist
4、andreferentialistapproachesina“modest”formofinferentialism,whichwediscussinSect.5,pointingoutthatthisapproachrunsafoulofissuesfacingthefulldeterminationofmeaningintermsofcategoricityandcompositionality.Ifinish,inSect.6bydiscussingamorepromisingresponsethatdoesnotrequire
5、semanticjustificationorrules,butlookstointernalconstraintsonrules,namelythattheyare“harmonious”However,this,itissuggested,isstillproblematicfromthepointofviewofcircularity,and,moreover,italsodoesnotcircumventtheissuesofcategoricityandcompositionality.1Inferentialism(ABr
6、iefOverview)Inferentialismisanapproachtothemeaningofexpressionsthattakestheagents’inferentialactivitytobetheprimarysemanticnotion.Ratherthantakereference,ordenotationsofexpressions,toestablishmeaning,itiscertainrulesofinference(andinferencesthemselves)thatdothisjob.Thi
7、sbelongstoawidertraditioninphilos-ophyoflanguage,perhapsmostclearlyarticulatedintheworkofRobertBrandom(e.g.[1]),whoarguesthatourlanguageuseoughttobeunderstoodintermsofa“gameofgivingandaskingforreasons”(GOGAR)[2].Broadlyspeaking,then,inferentialismisakindofconceptualrol
8、esemantics,inwhichthemeaningofacon-©SpringerInternationalPublishingAG201721J.Trafford,MeaninginDialogue,StudiesinAppl