Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason

Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason

ID:39396196

大小:622.19 KB

页数:37页

时间:2019-07-02

Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason_第1页
Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason_第2页
Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason_第3页
Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason_第4页
Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason_第5页
资源描述:

《Enoch_The Disorder of Public Reason》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、REVIEWESSAYTheDisorderofPublicReason*DavidEnochAVERYQUICKOVERVIEWMuchofpoliticalphilosophy—certainlyintheliberaltradition—iscon-cernedwithanattempttoreconcilethetensionwithwhichRousseauopensTheSocialContract:Manisbornfree;andeverywhereheisinchainsðJ.J.Rousseau,TheSocialContrac

2、t½Hertfordshire:WordsworthEditions,1998,5Þ.Butthistraditionhasmissedthescopeoftheprob-lem.Foritsnotjustpoliticalobligationthatrestrictspeoplesfreedom,thatmakespurportedlyauthoritativedemandsonthem,inawaythatisinitiallyintensionwiththeirbeingfree.Suchdemandsarealsomadebysocialm

3、orality,thesetofsocial-moralrulesthatrequireorprohibitac-tion,andsogroundmoralimperativesthatwedirecttoeachothertoen-gagein,orrefrainfrom,certainlinesofconductð2Þ.Whatweneed,then,isnotjustawayofreconcilingpoliticalauthoritywithfreedom.Weneedawayofreconcilingtheauthorityofsocia

4、lmorality,ormoralobligation,withfreedomðe.g.,224Þ.Now,wehavetofacethefacts.Thereisnotgoingtobeanykindofconsensusonanythinginthevicinityhere.Disagreementisheretostay,notjustamongusfolkbutalsoamongtherealisticallyidealizedMem-bersofthePublicð27Þ.Differentpeople,anddifferentMembe

5、rsofthePublicðhenceforth,MPsÞ,havedifferentevaluativestandards,believetheyhavedifferentreasonsforactions,andsoon.Evenwhentheyagreeonwhatisofvalue,theydisagreeontrade-offratesbetweenvaluesð536Þ.So*AcriticalstudyofGeraldGaussTheOrderofPublicReason:ATheoryofFreedomandMoralityinaD

6、iverseandBoundedWorldðCambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2011Þ,pp.642,$99.00ðclothÞ.Allreferencestochapters,sections,andpagenumbersaretothisbook,unlessotherwisenoted.Fordetailed,extremelyhelpfulcommentsonanearlierdraft,IthankananonymousreaderforEthics.Ethics124(October2013):1–

7、36©2013byTheUniversityofChicago.Allrightsreserved.0014-1704/2013/12401-00XX$10.00113187.proof.3d1AchornInternational06/27/20132:34AM2EthicsOctober2013consensusonreasonstoendorsetherulesofsocialmoralityisnottobehad.Luckily,though,norisitnecessary.Convergenceisquiteenoughðe.g.,x

8、vi,283,etc.Þ.Theproblemisthatasocialmoralitythatmakesdemandsq

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。