资源描述:
《Analysis of the Historical System of the.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、TheChineseEconomy,vol.37,no.2,March–April2004,pp.47–55.©2004M.E.Sharpe,Inc.Allrightsreserved.ISSN1097–1475/2004$9.50+0.00.SHIJINCHUANAnalysisoftheHistoricalSystemoftheWenzhouModelAViewfromthePerspectiveofPersonalizedTransactionandNonpersonalizedTransactionAbstract:Thisarticleusesthetheor
2、eticalanalysisofthehistoricalsystemusedtostudythetradeandindustryoftheWenzhoumodel,whichexpoundsthreeimpor-tantissuesaboutWenzhou’seconomyanditspeople’seconomyfromtheperspec-tiveofpersonalizedtransactionandnonpersonalizedtransaction,andpointsoutapossibletrendinthedevelopmentofWenzhou’sme
3、thodology.“TheWenzhoumodel,”asatransformationofthelocaleconomicsystemthathasitsownfeaturesandpatternofeconomicdevelopment,hasalwaysbeenacontro-versialissueattractingintellectualattentiononthreefronts:theprocessofChina’sreform,implementationoftheopendoorpolicy,andeconomicdevelopment(ShiJi
4、nchuanetal.2002).Inrecentyears,withthefurtherdevelopmentofthereformandthegradualestablishmentofamarketeconomicsystem,theWenzhoumodelhasbeentransformedfroma“verycontroversial”issuetoa“fullyaffirmative”topic.TheperspectiveofthisarticleontheWenzhoumodelmaybeofthetype,“negationofnegation,”tr
5、ansformingtheWenzhoumodelfrombeinga“fullyaf-firmative”topicbackto“verycontroversial”onceagain.First,thisarticleraisesthequestionthatneedstobeansweredinlightofvariousTranslation©2004byM.E.Sharpe,Inc.,fromtheChinesetext:ShiJinchuan,“Wenzhoumoshidelishizhidufenxi,”Zhejiangshehuikexue(Zhejia
6、ngSocialSciences),no.2(2004).ShiJinchuan,bornin1957,holdsaPh.D.ineconomics,andisaprofessorintheTianzeResearchCenterofNon-StateEconomy,ZhejiangUniversity.TheauthorisgratefulforthehelpprovidedbyProfessorsZhangShuguang,ZhangXukun,ZhuKangdui,AssociatePro-fessorCaoZhenghan,andPh.D.studentQian
7、Taointheanalysisandwritingofthisarticle.TranslatedbyMingQiang.4748THECHINESEECONOMYeventsconcerningWenzhou’seconomyandthepeopleinWenzhou’seconomy.Itthenoutlinesatheoreticalframeworktostudybothoftheseeconomiesthroughananalysisofthehistoricalprocess.Finally,itusesthetheoret