美国《反海外腐败法》域外管辖权合理性的研究

《美国《反海外腐败法》域外管辖权合理性的研究》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、"#ᦻ%ឋ'(ᜧᦻ!ឋ"#)*+,'(：ᡠᕈ/Ḅ"#ᦻ，2)*ᙠḄᢣ4，5678Ẇ:;<ᡠ=>Ḅᡂ?。◀ᦻBCDE(FᵨḄᑁI᜜，)#ᦻKᒹMNOᐸQR*ᡈTUVDW⊤ᡈYᑏ[Ḅ<ᡂ?。])ᦻḄẆ:^_,⌕abḄR*cTU，ᙳCᙠᦻBe(fgh᪗(。)*ᐰklᑮ)'(Ḅno?ᵫ)*qr。"#ᦻ<ὅtu：ᨴI。u万方数据"#ᦻ᱐ᩗxᵨᣴᩗyᜧᦻ᱐ᩗ%ᵨᣴᩗ()"#ᦻ<ὅᐰz{᪥ᨵᐵᶇ、xᵨ"#ᦻḄ，k᪥ᶇᔣᨵᐵᡈ᪀〈/#ᦻḄᓺcᵯ᱐，ᐕ#ᦻ▅c▅。)*ᣴᩗ/ᜧe)"

2、#ᦻḄᐰᡈᑖᑁIᐭᨵᐵᦪ¢£78¤¥，e¦ᵨ§ᓺ、¨ᓺᡈ©ª«ᑴ®¯c°)"#ᦻ。±□，ᙠ—{±²〉ᵨ)ᣴᩗy。)"#ᦻ´µ)*+#(¶ᙠeg᪾ᑁᡭ“V”）"#ᦻ<ὅt»ᦟt：:…ᨴ-万方数据᤺⌕《᜜ῖ》᜜ᩗḄᔠᳮឋẆ᤺⌕½《¿᜜ῖÁ》Ḅ¿ῖÁᩩÄᙠᑴÅÆÇᐹᨵÉ᜜ឋ，D[1998ÊËc᡻ᐵᙠÍÎBḄ{Ï，FCPA⊤Ð_zÑÒḄÉ᜜ÓÔᩗ。]Õ，ÖׯᙠØÙ，¿]kÚÛÜFCPAḄÉ᜜〉HJ᪀ᡂᦻᓄÞßà，áâãQßᩗ。FCPAḄå8æ᜜çè*Wéê，ëéê8ÜḄᱯឋíîFCPAÉ᜜ïÔ

3、ᩗð⌕ឋcᔠᳮឋ。ó½、>:、ô、᡻cW▭õRö÷ᑖ᪆FCPAÉ᜜ÓÔᩗḄᔠᳮឋcTHùឋ,½úíîFCPAeÉ᜜ÓÔᩗḄᩗûᩭýÜ᜜ᖪÿᩩÄð⌕c〉ᩩÄ，ÓẠᒹ´ᙢᑣ、´*ᑣcᦔ?ᑣ，2É᜜ÓÔᩗo᪀ᓄ▲ᑴcù▲ᑴ，ᑮ▭_KᑣcᔠᳮឋᑣḄ▲ᑴ。ÍÎḄFCPAÉ᜜f?Ôᩗe▲ᑴ，FCPAḄÉ᜜IfÔᩗ¯Kᔠᳮ!ᜐ，#Ùó½6、ô、᡻$ᐸãᫀçnj&☢▲ᑴFCPAḄÉ᜜ïÔᩗ。ᐵ/0：《᜜ῖ》、᜜3ᩗ、ᔠᳮឋ万方数据AI3SIRACTTHEST

4、UDYONTHEREASONABLENESSOFTHEEXTRATERRITORIALJURISDICTIONOFTHEU.S.FOREIGNCORRUPTPRACTICESACTABSTRACTTheanti-briberyprovisionoftheU.S.ForeignCorruptPracticesActwasoriginallyenactedwithextraterritoriality,afteramendedin1998andtheinterpretedbytheexecutiveauthoritiesinenforcem

5、entactions，FCPAshowsquitebroadextraterritorialjurisdiction.WithregardtotheFCPA5Sextraterritorialapplication,therehavebeenlotsofcritics,thosewhoobjecttotheextraterritorialreachofFCPAbelievethatitconstitutesculturalimperialismandoverreachesintothesovereigntyofindividualcou

6、ntries.ThespecificcharacteristicsoftransnationalpublicbriberywhichFCPA’santi-briberyprovisionregulatesgivesomenecessityandreasonablenesstotheFCPA’sextraterritorialjurisdiction.ThepowerfortheCongresstogranttheextraterritorialjurisdictiontoFCPAisstemsfromtheForeignCommerce

7、ClauseandNecessaryandProperClause，andtheextraterritorialjurisdictionofFCPAmayfinditsjurisdictionalbasesontheterritorialprinciple,nationalityprincipleandeffectsdoctrinewhichareallrecognizedunderinternationallaw.However,U.S.constitutionimposesstructurallimitationandDueProc

8、essClausetolimittheassertionofextraterritorialjurisdiction,万方数据andtherearequitemanytheorieslimittheextr