欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:27651497
大小:55.00 KB
页数:7页
时间:2018-12-05
《反压法推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效观察》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、反压法推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效观廖信祥广丙玉林市中医院推拿科广丙玉林537000【摘要】目的:观察反压法推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效。方法:选该病患者280例,随机分为两组。治疗组以反压法为主推拿治疗;对照组牵引为主治疗,两组5天为一疗程。治疗两个疗程。结果:治疗组痊愈87例,好转49例,无效4例,总有效率为97.14%;对照组痊愈42例,好转59例,无效39例,总有效率为72.14%;差异有显著性统计学意义(p<0.01)。结论:反压法推拿治疗疗效优于颈部牵引治疗,有推广意义。【关键词】反压法推拿;椎动脉型颈椎病;疗效观察【中
2、图分类号】R681.55【文献标识码】B【文章编号】1674-8999(2015)8-0039-02Theanti-pressuremassageclinicalobservationontreatmentofvertebralarterytypeofcervicalspondylosisLiaoXinxiang(MassageDepartmentinGuangxiYulinTraditionalChineseMedicineHospital,GuangxiYulin537000)【Abstract】objective:toob
3、servetheanti-pressuremassagetherapycurativeeffectoncervicalspondylosisofvertebralarterytype.Methods:280casesofthediseasewererandomlydividedintotwogroups.Thetreatmentgroupisgivenprioritytothepressuremassagetherapy;thecomparedgroupistractiontreatment.Boththetwogroupswi
4、llhave5daysforoneperiodoftreatment.Therearetwocoursesoftreatment.Results:thetreatmentgroup,thereare87casescured,improvementin49cases,4caseswereineffective,thetotaleffectiveratewas97.14%;Andthecomparedgroup,42casescured,improved59cases,39caseswereineffective,thetotale
5、ffectiveratewas72.14%;Therearesignificantdifference(p<0.01).Conclusion:thepressuremassagetherapycurativeeffectisbetterthanthatofcervicaltractiontreatmentmethod,itissignificancetospread.【Keywords】anti-pressuremassage;Vertebralarterytypeofcervicalspondylosis;Clinica
6、lobservationoneffectiveVertebral-artery-typecervicalspondylosiswithmassagesectionisthemostcommonformofthedisease.FromJanuary2010toDecember2012,theauthoruseanti-pressuremassagemethodintreating140casesofvertebralarterytypeofcervicalspondylosis,andcervicaltractiontreatm
7、entof140casesofcomparison.Reportsareasfollows.椎动脉型颈椎病是颈椎病中最常见类型,K发病仅次于神经根型颈椎病,对人类健康造成很大的危害[1】。2010年1月至2012年12月,笔者采用反压法为主推拿治疗椎动脉型颈椎病140例,与颈椎牵引为主治疗140例作对照,.报道如下。1临床资料1.1一般资料同期我院住院椎动脉型颈椎病患者280例。随机分为两组各140例。治疗组男48例,女92例;年龄19〜61岁,平均(41.61±8.01);病程3天〜17个月。对照组140例中,男
8、63例,女77例;年龄20〜61岁,平均(41.58±8.21)o病程3天〜18个月。两组病例均排除外伤性颈椎骨折及脱位。两组在性别、年龄、病程等方面比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),具有可比性。1.2诊断标准[2]:参照全国高等中医药院校,推
此文档下载收益归作者所有