优质护理在甲状腺瘤术后出血患者中的应用效果

《优质护理在甲状腺瘤术后出血患者中的应用效果》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、优质护理在甲状腺瘤术后出血患者中的应用效果［摘要］目的探讨优质护理在甲状腺瘤术后出血患者中的应用效果。方法选取2012年3月〜2015年3月我院收治的甲状腺瘤术后出血患者96例为研究对象，按照随机双盲法分为对照组和观察组，各48例。对照组进行常规护理措施，观察组在对照组的基础上实施优质护理。对比两组患者护理后的焦虑评分、抑郁评分、术后出血发生率和术后出血再次手术发生率以及护理满意情况。结果观察组护理后焦虑评分为(21.23土0.54)分，抑郁评分为(20.65土0.57)分，术后出血发生率为8.33

2、%，患者术后出血再次手术发生率为4.17%，护理满意率为97.92%;对照组护理后僥虑评分为(43.35±0.46)分，抑郁评分为(42.62±0.17)分，术后出血发生率为29.17%，术后出血再次手术发生率为22.92%,护理满意率为77.08%,两组比较，差异有统计学意义(P［关键词］优质护理；甲状腺瘤；术后出血；满意度［中图分类号］R736.1［文献标识码］A［文章编号］1674-4721(2016)12(a)-0191-03Applicationeffectsofhigh-qualityn

3、ursinginthepatientswithpostoperativebleedingofthyrophymaKOUYue-xiaDepartmentofSecondSurgery,TumorHospitalofAnshanCityinLiaoningProvince,Anshan114036,China[Abstract]ObjectiveToexploretheapplicationeffectsofhigh-qualitynursinginthepatientswithpostoperati

4、vebleedingofthyrophyma.Methods96patientswithpostoperativebleedingofthyrophymafromMarch2012toMarch2015inourhospitalwereselectedastheresearchsubjects.Theyweredividedintothecontrolgroupandtheobservationgroupaccordingtorandomizeddouble-blindmethod，48casesi

5、neachgroup.Thecontrolgroupwasgivenroutinenursingcare,andtheobservationgroupwasgivenhigh-qualitynursingcareonthebasisofthecontrolgroup.Theanxietyscore，depressionscore,postoperativebleedingrate,rateofreoperationduetopostoperativebleedingandsatisfactionde

6、greetowardsnursingwerecomparedbetweenthetwogroups.ResultsTheanxietyscorewas(21.23±0.54)scores，thescoreofdepressionwas(20.65±0.57)scores，therateofpostoperativebleedingwas8.33%，therateofreoperationduetopostoperativebleedingwas4.17%aswellastherateofnursin

7、gsatisfactionwas97.92%oftheobservationgrouppatients,theanxietyscorewas(43.95+0.46)scores，thescoreofdepressionwas(42.62+0.17)scores，therateofpostoperativebleedingwas29.17%，therateofreoperationduetopostoperativebleedingwas22.92%andtherateofnursingsatisfa

8、ctionwas77.08%inthecontrolgroupafterthenursing,twogroupswerecompared，thedifferentsweresiginificant(p1资料与方法1.1一般资料选取2012年3月〜2015年3月本院收治的甲状腺瘤术后出血患者％例作为研究对象，按照随机双盲法将其分为对照组与观察组，各48例。对照组男性25例，占52.08%,女性23例，占47.92%;年龄30〜59岁，平均(41.13±0.35)岁。观察