论我国审前羁押制度完善

《论我国审前羁押制度完善》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、安徽大学硕士学位论文题目专业研究方向论我国审前羁押制度的完善诉讼法学刑事诉讼法学姓名导师姓名靳真文王圣扬届别职称二〇〇八教授二〇〇八年四月二十日目录摘要························································ⅠAbstract························································Ⅲ引言·················································

2、·········1一、审前羁押的概念··············································2（一）审前羁押的含义·········································2（二）审前羁押的功能········································3（三）审前羁押的性质·········································4（四）审前羁押制度的原则·······················

3、··············7二、部分国家和地区审前羁押制度的考量····························15（一）美国羁押制度的主要内容·································15（二）法国、德国羁押制度的主要内容···························16（三）日本羁押制度的主要内容·································17（四）俄罗斯羁押制度的主要内·································18

4、（五）台湾地区羁押制度的主要内容·····························19三、我国审前羁押的现状和成因····································21（一）我国审前羁押的现状·····································21（二）我国审前羁押制度缺陷之原因分析·························26四、我国审前羁押制度的构建和完善································29（一）实施审前羁押与拘

5、留、逮捕相分离制度·····················29（二）建立审前羁押的司法审查机制·····························31（三）保障律师帮助权，完善审前羁押救济制度···················32（四）改造取保候审制度，增设羁押的替代性措施·················34（五）完善错误羁押的赔偿制度·································36结语··········································

6、··············37参考文献························································38致谢························································40攻读硕士学位期间发表的学术论文目录······························41摘要审前羁押是刑事诉讼中对公民影响最深刻、涉及公民权利最深远的职权行为。审前羁押是国家为打击犯罪，而对个人权利所作的必要限制，是保证刑

7、事诉讼顺利进行的必要手段，是指在刑事案件交付法庭审判以前，依法将犯罪嫌疑人、被告人置于看守所或者其他规定的场所，限制其人身自由的一种强制措施。审前羁押制度，是法律规定的关于审前羁押的适用条件、适用程序、羁押期限、场所、羁押救济程序及被羁押人权利和待遇等一系列规则的总称。审前羁押的功能主要是为诉讼程序的顺利进行提供程序上的保障和预防嫌疑人继续实施危害社会的行为。关于羁押是否是一种强制措施在国外有不同的规定。如日本、意大利、法国等国认为羁押是区别于拘留、逮捕的一种强制措施；美国则认为羁押不是强制措施，而是确保被

8、告人到庭的预防性措施；在我国，羁押不是一种专门的强制措施，只是逮捕的必然后果。审前羁押具有强制措施的性质和预防的性质。从当前世界各国的立法看，审前羁押适用的原则概括起来主要有:无罪推定原则、程序法定原则、必要性原则、例外原则、比例原则、司法审查原则和法律救济原则。通过分析比较国外的审前羁押制度，从中不难发现各国对有罪判决以前通过羁押剥夺公民人身自由的强制措施，均采取极其谨慎的态度，这体现了法治国家司法裁判中所必不