口服对比剂对肝外胆道梗阻病变ct重组及诊断的影响

《口服对比剂对肝外胆道梗阻病变ct重组及诊断的影响》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。

1、口服对比剂对肝外胆道梗阻病变CT重组及诊断的影响作者：李跃明曹代荣倪希和【摘要】目的研究不同口服对比剂及其服用方法对肝外胆道梗阻病变CT重组和诊断的影响。方法分析198例胆道梗阻病例CT资料和重组图像。根据口服不同的肠道对比剂分为阴性组（水溶液或等渗甘露醇）和阳性组（2%泛影葡胺溶液），根据服用方法是否指导分为随机组和指导组，分别判断其肠道准备满意度并进行统计分析。对CT扫描数据进行薄层重建和MPR，CPR，MinIP及VR后处理重组，判断图像满意率和诊断准确率，并进行统计学分析。结果阳性组（87.60%）和阴性组（90.30%）图像显示满意率无显著差别（x2=0.365，P＞0.05）。指

2、导组（95.89%）比随机组（80.08%）图像显示满意率高，差别有统计学意义（x2=8.911，P<0.05）。肠道口服对比剂准备满意组定位诊断准确率为96.49%，定性准确率为95.45%。不满意组定位诊断准确率为59.26%，定性准确率为55.56%。满意组比不满意组定位（x2=493.789，P<0.05）和定性（x2=490.669，P<0.05）准确率高，差别有统计学意义。结论胆道梗阻病变CT扫描前合理的肠道对比剂准备方法是采用指导下的分段口服法。肠道对比剂准备满意者有助于提高胆道梗阻病变的定位和定性诊断准确率。【关键词】肠道准备口服对比剂肝外胆道梗阻CT重组诊

3、断10[Abstract]ObjectiveTostudytheinfluenceofdifferentbowelpreparationbyoralcontrastmediuminthecomputedtomographyreforminganddiagnosisofextrahepaticbiliaryobstruction.MethodsCTscandataandpost-processreformingimagesincludingMPR，CPR，MinIPandVRin198caseswithextrahepaticbiliaryobstructionswereanalyzed.Ne

4、gativegroup(waterorisotonicmannite)andpositivegroup（2%meglucaminediatrizoate）weredividedintoaccordingtotheadministrationofdifferentoralcontrastmedium.Twogroupsincludingrandomgroupandinstructivegroupwerealsoanalyzeddependonwhetherthepatientsweregiveninstructiveinformationornotonhowtotaketheoralcontr

5、astmediumproperly.StatisticanalysisweredonerespectivelyaccordingtothesatisfactionratioofbowelpreparationandthequalityofCTreformingimagingandtheaccuracyoflocalizingandqualitativediagnosis.ResultsTherewasnosignificantdifferencestatisticallybetweennegativegroup（87.60%）andpositivegroup（90.30%）onthesati

6、sfactionratioofreformingimaging（x2=0.365，P>0.05）,butsignificantdifferencebetweenrandomgroup（80.08%）andinstructivegroup（95.89%）（x2=8.911，P<0.05）.Theaccuracyoflocalizingand10qualitativediagnosisforpatientswithsatisfiedbowelpreparationwere96.49%and95.45%respectively.Whereastheaccuracyoflocalizin

7、gandqualitativediagnosisforpatientswithunsatisfiedbowelpreparationwere59.26%and55.56%respectively.Therewasstatisticallysignificantdifferencebetweenthemontheaccuracyoflocalizingdiagnosis(x2=493.789，P<0.05