the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪

the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪

ID:9292147

大小:90.00 KB

页数:26页

时间:2018-04-26

the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪_第1页
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪_第2页
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪_第3页
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪_第4页
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪_第5页
资源描述:

《the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大学生态效度的罪》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库

1、RepresentativeDesign26SinsCommittedintheNameofEcologicalValidity:ACallforRepresentativeDesigninEducationScienceJohnDunlosky1,SaraBottiroli2,andMarissaHartwig11KentStateUniversity2UniversityofPaviaRunninghead:RepresentativedesignInpress,HandbookofMetacognitioninEducation.D.Hacker,J.D

2、unlosky,&A.Graesser(Eds).NY:PsychologyPress.RepresentativeDesign26SinsCommittedintheNameofEcologicalValidity:ACallforRepresentativeDesigninEducationScienceDoyouwantconclusionsandfindingsfromeducationresearchtogeneralizetoreal-worldeducation,wherestudentsaretaught,learn,andaretested?

3、Incritiquingeducationresearch,areyouconcernedwhenitisnotecologicallyvalid?Mostofuswouldanswer“yes”tobothofthesequestions.Evenifwebelievethatbroadgeneralizabilitymaynotbefeasibleinanyoneexperiment,conducting“ecologicallyvalid”researchisnodoubtanidealtowhichwestillstrive.Inthepresentc

4、hapter,weagreethatgeneralizabilityisessential,butwedeconstructecologicalvalidityandarguethatthetermisoftenmisusedandmisrepresentedinamannerthatmayultimatelystiflethedevelopmentofmethodsforachievinggeneralizability.Forthoseofyouwhoansweredbothquestionswitharesounding“yes,”andtheprese

5、ntauthorscertainlyhavedoneso,wemustemphasizethatourgoalisnottounderminetheidealofvalidity–everysocialscientist’sdesireistoconductresearchthatisgeneralizabletoatargetecology.Indeed,wemeantoholdthisidealwiththehighestregard,andbydoingso,wewillrevealthesinscommittedinthenameofecologica

6、lvalidityandthepromiseofresearchprogramsthatareinformedbyrepresentativedesign.Bynomeansarewethefirsttocallforthisreformwithinthescientificcommunity–toscrutinizetheuseofthetermecologicalvalidityandtoattendmoredeeplytoissuespertainingtogeneralizability.Otherswhohavemadesuchacallinclud

7、eAraújo,Davids,andPassos(2007),Hammond(1998),Petrinovich(1989),andSchmuckler(2001).AlthougheachoftheseauthorsofferuniqueinsightsaboutRepresentativeDesign26conductingresearchthatwillgeneralize,theyallconvergeonacommontheme:Theconceptofecologicalvalidityisinadequateforguidingthedesign

8、ofresearchthatwillg

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。