Philosophy & Public Affairs

Philosophy & Public Affairs

ID:40087478

大小:1.73 MB

页数:16页

时间:2019-07-20

Philosophy & Public Affairs_第1页
Philosophy & Public Affairs_第2页
Philosophy & Public Affairs_第3页
Philosophy & Public Affairs_第4页
Philosophy & Public Affairs_第5页
资源描述:

《Philosophy & Public Affairs》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、CommunitarianCriticsofLiberalismLiberalismandtheLimitsofJustice.byMichaelSandel;MoralityandtheLiberalIdeal.byMichaelSandel;AfterVirtue.byAlasdairMacIntyre;IsPatriotismaVirtue.byAlasdairMacIntyre;StrongDemocracy:ParticipatoryPoliticsforaNewAge.byBenja

2、minBarber;Atomism.byCharlesTaylor;Powers,PossessionsandFreedom:EssaysinHonorofC.B.MacPherson.byAkisKontos;"TheDiversityofGoods,"in...Reviewby:AmyGutmannPhilosophy&PublicAffairs,Vol.14,No.3(Summer,1985),pp.308-322Publishedby:Wiley-BlackwellStableURL:h

3、ttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2265353.Accessed:13/10/201216:13YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceoftheTerms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,re

4、searchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org..Princeto

5、nUniversityPressandWiley-BlackwellarecollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoPhilosophy&PublicAffairs.http://www.jstor.orgAMYGUTMANNCommunitarianCriticsofLiberalismWearewitnessingarevivalofcommunitariancriticismsofliberalpoliticalth

6、eory.LikethecriticsoftheI96os,thoseoftheI98osfaultliberalismforbeingmistakenlyandirreparablyindividualistic.Butthenewwaveofcriticismisnotamererepetitionoftheold.WhereastheearliercriticswereinspiredbyMarx,therecentcriticsareinspiredbyAristotleandHegel

7、.TheAristotelianideathatjusticeisrootedin"acommunitywhoseprimarybondisasharedunderstandingbothofthegoodformanandthegoodofthatcommunity"explicitlyinformsAlasdairMaclntyreinhiscriticismofJohnRawlsandRobertNozickfortheirneglectofdesert;IandCharlesTaylor

8、inhisattackon"atomistic"liberalswho"trytodefend...thepriorityoftheindividualandhisrightsoversociety."2TheHe-gelianconceptionofmanasahistoricallyconditionedbeingimplicitlyinformsbothRobertoUnger'sandMichaelSandel'srejectionoftheliberalviewofmanasafree

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。