Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON

Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON

ID:39447770

大小:239.84 KB

页数:55页

时间:2019-07-03

Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON_第1页
Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON_第2页
Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON_第3页
Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON_第4页
Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON_第5页
资源描述:

《Shapiro_LAW, PLANS, AND PRACTICAL REASON》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、LegalTheory,8(2002),387–441.PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmericaCopyright©CambridgeUniversityPress1352–3252/02$9.50Law,Plans,andPracticalReasonSCOTTJ.SHAPIROLAW,PLANS,ANDPRACTICALREASON*ScottJ.ShapiroBenjaminN.CardozoSchoolofLaw,YeshivaUniversityI.MORALITYORCONVENTION?Americanlawyersareaudaciousbyn

2、atureandhavebeenknown,onmorethanoneoccasion,tomakeoutrageousargumentsonbehalfoftheircli-ents.YetthereisoneclaimthateventhemostshamelessoflawyerswouldnotputforwardinanAmericancourt:NoonewouldeverchallengetheideathattheUnitedStatesConstitutionislawintheUnitedStates.1Forifthereisonepropositionoflaw

3、thatenjoysuniversalacceptancebythebenchandisheldwithunshakableconviction,itisthattheUnitedStatesConstitutiondeterminestheauthoritystructureofthefederalgovernmentandislegallybindingonallofficials.Itwillnotbemypurposeinthispapertochallengethisconsensuseither.Quiteobviously,theUnitedStatesConstitut

4、ionisgoodlaw.Rather,myaimwillbetofigureoutwhythispropositionistrue:WhatmakesitthecasethattheUnitedStatesConstitutionislawintheUnitedStates?Whatjustifiestheconvictionofthecourts?Thisquestionisphilosophicallyinterestingbecauseitdoesnotadmitofanordinarylegalanswer.Thatis,thelegalityoftheConstitutio

5、ncannotbeestablishedbypointingtosomeotherruleauthorizingitscreation.TheConstitutionisultimatelawandassuch,itsexistenceaslawdoesnotdependontheexistenceofanyotherlaw.Tothecontrary,theConstitutionsetsouttheauthoritystructureofthefederalgovernmentandhenceplaystheroleasthefoundationalnormforthefedera

6、lsystem.Itvalidates;itisnotitselfvalidated.ThisquestionisquiteclearlynotuniquetotheUnitedStateslegalsystem*ThispaperwaspresentedattheLaw,Participation,andDemocracyConferenceheldattheYaleLawSchool,theUniversityofPennsylvaniaLawSchoollegaltheoryworkshop,andtheUniversityofTorontoLawschoollegaltheor

7、yworkshop,whereIbenefitedfromcommentsbyBruceAckerman,MattAdler,MichaelBratman,JulesColeman,MargaretGilbert,MarkGreen-berg,ChrisKutz,StephenPerry,PhilipPetit,ArthurRipstein,OriSimchen,MartinStone,andNicosStravropolous.1.Imagi

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。