资源描述:
《beyond rational choice theory 30036958》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、BeyondRationalChoiceTheoryAuthor(s):RaymondBoudonSource:AnnualReviewofSociology,Vol.29(2003),pp.1-21Publishedby:AnnualReviewsStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036958.Accessed:10/12/201307:57YouruseoftheJSTORarchiveindicatesyouracceptanceoftheTerms&ConditionsofUse,availableat.http://www.jstor
2、.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTORisanot-for-profitservicethathelpsscholars,researchers,andstudentsdiscover,use,andbuilduponawiderangeofcontentinatrusteddigitalarchive.Weuseinformationtechnologyandtoolstoincreaseproductivityandfacilitatenewformsofscholarship.FormoreinformationaboutJSTOR
3、,pleasecontactsupport@jstor.org..AnnualReviewsiscollaboratingwithJSTORtodigitize,preserveandextendaccesstoAnnualReviewofSociology.http://www.jstor.orgThiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onTue,10Dec201307:57:40AMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditionsThiscontentdownloadedfrom113.108.133.58onTue,1
4、0Dec201307:57:40AMAllusesubjecttoJSTORTermsandConditionsAnnu.Rev.Sociol.2003.29:1-21doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213Copyright©2003byAnnualReviews.AllrightsreservedFirstpublishedonlineasaReviewinAdvanceonJune4,2003BEYONDRATIONALCHOICETHEORYRaymondBoudonUniversityofParis-Sorbonne,UniversiteP
5、arisIV,ISHA,96boulevardRaspail,75006Paris,France;email:rboudon@noos.frKeyWordsbeliefs,cognitivism,epistemology,methodologicalindividualism,valuesUAbstractSkepticismtowardsociologyhasgrownoverrecentyears.Theatten-tiongrantedtorationalchoicetheory(RCT)is,toalargeextent,areactionagainstthissituation.
6、Withoutdoubt,RCTisaproductiveinstrument,butitfailssignallyinexplainingpositivenontrivialbeliefsaswellasnormativenonconsequentialbeliefs.RCT'sfailuresareduetoitsmovetousetoonarrowadefinitionofrationality.AmodelcanbedevelopedthatcombinestheadvantagesoftheRCT(mainlyprovidingself-sufficientexplanation
7、s),withoutfallingvictimtoitsshortcomings.Thismodelisimplicitlyusedinclassicalandmodemsociologicalworksthatareconsideredtobeilluminatingandvalid.RCT:ASOLUTIONTOTHECRISISOFSOCIOLOGY?Itisevidentthatsociologyhasnotac