资源描述:
《对于高校贫困生的心理健康状况与应对方式的相关研究 中英文对照》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库。
1、对于高校贫困生的心理健康状况与应对方式的相关研究中英文对照ResearchonmentalhealthandcopingstyleofimpoverishedcollegestudentsinChineseandEnglish运用症状自评量表(SCL-90)与应对方式问卷(CSQ)量表在大学生进行调查获取有效问卷1488份,其中贫困大学生728名,非贫困生760名,分析他们的心理健康状况和应对方式的状况,贫困大学生在恐怖、偏执、强迫、敏感、抑郁、焦虑、精神病性七个因子高于非贫困生,贫困生在外在求助方面也明
2、显低于非贫困生。并对比二者间的关系进行分析,探讨贫困生心理发展与人格特点。Usingthesymptomchecklist90(SCL-90)questionnaireandcopingstyles(CSQ)scaleinvestigationand1488validquestionnaireswereobtainedinthecollegestudents,including728poorstudents,poorstudents760,analysisofmentalhealthstatusandco
3、pingstyleoftheircondition,poorcollegestudentsinterror,paranoid,obsessive,sensitive,depression,anxiety,neurosissevenfactorhigherthanpoorstudents,intheexternalhelpisalsosignificantlylowerthanthenon-poorstudentspoorstudents.Analysisandcomparisonoftherelation
4、shipbetweenthetwo,ofpoorstudents'psychologicaldevelopmentandpersonalitycharacteristics. 【关键词】贫困生心理健康应对方式 [keyword]thepoorstudents'psychologicalcopingstyle 1研究方法与过程1researchmethodsandprocess 1.1调查对象1.1investigationobject 选取来自河南省6所高校的本科生为调查对象,抽样比例考虑在校生的
5、男女、年级、专业、生源、籍贯等的实际分布,以使样本结构有充分的代表性。获取有效问卷1488份,其中贫困生728人,非贫困生760人,贫困生和非贫困生在年级、专业等方面无明显统计学差异。Selectedfrom6universitiesofHenanprovinceundergraduatesastheresearchobject,samplingproportionconsideringtheactualdistributionofthemaleandfemalestudents,grade,profes
6、sional,students,placeoforigin,inordertomakethesamplestructurearefullyrepresentative.1488validquestionnaireswereobtained,ofwhich728poorstudents,760peoplearenotpoorstudents,poorstudentsandnon-poorstudentsingrade,professional,nostatisticallysignificantdiffer
7、ence. 1.2调查的方法与程序Themethodandprocedureof1.2survey 由课题组成员分别与被试所在的学校联系,向被试讲清调查的意义和需要注意的事项,然后由被试根据问卷要求作答,限时45分钟,要求当场回答完所有的问题。Bythemembersoftheprojectgrouparerespectivelyconnectedwiththesubjectsschoolcontact,tomakematterswereinvestigatedthemeaningandtheneed
8、topayattentionto,andthenbythesubjectsaccordingtothequestionnaireaskedtheanswer,thetimelimitis45minutes,requirementsonthespottoanswerallthequestions. 2结果与分析2resultsandanalysis 2.1贫困生与非贫困生心理健康水平比较2.1poorstudentsandn