gmat写作题库范文(七十九)-智课教育

《gmat写作题库范文(七十九)-智课教育》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。

1、智课网GMAT备考资料GMAT写作题库范文（七十九）-智课教育写作是个厚积薄发的考试，同学们在备考GMAT写作时，不仅要多练习，也要去掌握一些重点语句。有些题库范文是需要大家掌握并且熟练记忆的，熟记于心才能运用自如，才能举一反三。接下来小编就给大家介绍一下GMAT写作范文，希望对大家备考GMAT写作考试有帮助。79.Thefollowingappearedaspartofacompanymemorandum.“Adoptinganofficialcodeofethicsregardingbusinesspracticesmayinthelongrundoourcompan

2、ymoreharmthangoodinthepubliceye.Whenoneofourcompetitorsreceivedunfavorablepublicityforviolatingitsowncodeofethics,itgotmoreattentionfromthemediathanitwouldhaveifithadhadnosuchcode.Ratherthanadoptanofficialcodeofethics,therefore,weshouldinsteadconductapublicitycampaignthatstressestheimport

3、anceofprotectingtheenvironmentandassistingcharitableorganizations.”Discusshowwellreasoned...etc.公司备忘录的一部分：采用正式的商业操作道德条例从长远看对我公司在公众眼中的形象弊大于利。当我们的一个竞争者由于违反了他自己的道德条例从而得到公众指责时，他会从媒体那里得到比没有条例时更多的关注。因此，与其采用正式的道德条例，我们不如开展一场强调保护环境和帮助慈善组织的公众运动。Thiscompanymemorandumsuggeststhat,inlieuofadoptinganof

4、ficialcodeofethics,thecompanyshouldconductapublicitycampaignthatstressestheimportanceofpromotingcertainsocietalinterests.Thereasonforthesuggestionisthatanofficialcodeofethicsmightharmthecompanyinthepubliceyebecauseacompetingcompanyreceivedunfavorablepublicityforviolatingitsownethicscode.T

5、hisargumentisunconvincing,sinceitdependsonseveralunwarrantedassumptionsaswellasarguingagainstitsownconclusion.Firstofall,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatthetwocompaniesaresufficientlysimilartoensurethesameconsequencesofadoptinganethicscodeforthiscompanyasforitscompetitor.Thecompetitormayhavea

6、doptedanentirelydifferentcodefromtheonethiscompanymightadopt—perhapswithunrealisticstandardsnotembracedbyanyothercompanies.Perhapsthecompetitor’sviolationwasextremelyegregious,amountingtoanaberrationamongbusinessesofitstype;orperhapsonenotoriousexecutiveissolelyresponsibleforthecompetitor

7、’sviolation.Anyofthesescenarios,iftrue,wouldshowthatthetwocompaniesaredissimilarinwaysrelevanttothelikelihoodthatthiscompanywillexperiencesimilarviolationsandsimilarpublicityifitadoptsanyethicscode.Secondly,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatthecompetitorwasdamagedbyitscod