gmat逻辑削弱题解析(113)-智课教育

《gmat逻辑削弱题解析(113)-智课教育》由会员上传分享，免费在线阅读，更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。

1、智课网GMAT备考资料GMAT逻辑削弱题解析（113）-智课教育削弱题是对文章结论的弱化和反驳，通俗来讲就是文章说某件事可以发生，我们就努力说明这件事不太可能发生，接下来小编就GMAT逻辑削弱题解析介绍给大家，希望为考生备考GMAT逻辑助一臂之力。一、WEAKEN：削弱113.Thepharmaceuticalindustryarguesthatbecausenewdrugswillnotbedevelopedunlessheavydevelopmentcostscanberecoupedinlatersales,thecurrent2

2、0yearsofprotectionprovidedbypatentsshouldbeextendedinthecaseofnewlydevelopeddrugs.However,inotherindustriesnew-productdevelopmentcontinuesdespitehighdevelopmentcosts,afactthatindicatesthattheextensionisunnecessary.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,moststronglysupportsthepharmac

3、euticalindustry’sargumentagainstthechallengemadeabove?(A)Noindustriesotherthanthepharmaceuticalindustryhaveaskedforanextensionofthe20-yearlimitonpatentprotection.(不相关：其他工业)(B)Clinicaltrialsofnewdrugs,whichoccurafterthepatentisgrantedandbeforethenewdrugcanbemarketed,often

4、nowtakeaslongas10yearstocomplete.(相关：研发周期长)(C)Thereareseveralindustriesinwhichtheratioofresearchanddevelopmentcoststorevenuesishigherthanitisinthepharmaceuticalindustry.(不相关：其他工业成本高，反对)(D)Anexistingpatentforadrugdoesnotlegallypreventpharmaceuticalcompaniesfrombringingtom

5、arketalternativedrugs,providedtheyaresufficientlydissimilartothepatenteddrug.(不相关：专利保护不力，反对)(E)Muchrecentindustrialinnovationhasoccurredinproducts—forexample,inthecomputerandelectronicsindustries—forwhichpatentprotectionisoftenveryineffective.(不相关：其他工业专利效果)分类：看原文：前提1(隐含假

6、设)：前提2(事实)：总结论(推测)：找答案：TEST：模型或要素：研发成本、专利保护、时限考点：找出其他因素;比较，找差异以上就是关于GMAT逻辑削弱题解析的相关内容介绍，希望大家能够了解。多多备考了解GMAT相关信息，争取做到万无一失。更多关于GMAT逻辑削弱题解析的内容介绍小编会为大家呈现。最后祝大家顺利备考GMAT考试，早日梦圆名校。