欢迎来到天天文库
浏览记录
ID:54591786
大小:227.66 KB
页数:3页
时间:2020-05-02
《产道无痛分娩与自然分娩的临床观察.pdf》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在行业资料-天天文库。
1、·936·医学临床研究2014年5月第31卷第5期Jines!型!!·论著·产道无痛分娩与自然分娩的临床观察王立新薛锋(1.河北省承德市妇幼保健院产房,河北承德067000;2.河北省平泉县中医院妇产科,河北平泉067500)[摘要]【目的】分析无痛分娩与自然分娩的临床差异。【方法】选取本院2012年8月至2013年8月收治的400例足月孕妇作为研究对象,按照随机数字表分为观察组与对照组各200例,观察组孕妇采用无痛分娩,对照组采用自然分娩,比较两种方法的临床差异。【结果】观察组分娩过程中的疼痛情况明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P2、05);观察组分娩过程中第一产程、第二产程的时间均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PdO.05);观察组分娩过程中的脉搏、心率、氧分压、二氧化碳分压均明显优于对照组,更接近于正常均值,且差异具有统计学意义(PdO.05)。【结论】产道无痛分娩相比自然分娩具有显著的镇痛作用,能更有效地提高分娩的质量,安全性更好,值得临床推广应用。[关键词]分娩;疼痛AnalysisoftheDifferenceBetweenBirthCanalPainlessLaborandSpontaneousLaborWfANGLi—xin.rEFeng(Delive3、ryRoom,MaternalandChildHealthHospitalofChengdeCity,Hebei067000,China)[Abstract][Objective]Toanalyzethedifferencebetweenbirthcanalpainlesslaborandspontaneouslabor.[Methods]Totally400full—termpregnantwomeninourhospitalfromAug.2012tOAug.2013wereenrolledinthestudy.Accordingtoth4、erandomnumbertable.allthesewomenweredividedintoobservationgroup(一200)andcontrolgroup(,2:200).Theobservationgroupwasgivenpainlesslabor,whilethecontrolgroupwasgivenspontaneouslabor.ClinicaldifferencebetweentWOmethodswasanalyzed.[Results]Thepainintheobservationgroupduringthech5、ildbirthwasobviouslybetterthanthatinthecontrolgroup,andtherewassig—nificantdifference(PdO.05).Thetimeoffirstandsecondstageofchildbirthintheobservationgroupduringthechildbirthwereobviouslylowerthanthoseinthecontrolgroup,andtherewassignificantdifference(P<0.05).Pulse,heartrat6、e,partialpressureofoxygenandcarbondioxideintheobservationgroupduringthechildbirthwereobviouslybetterthanthecontrolgroupandclosertOnormalmeanvalue,andtherewassignifi—cantdifference(PdO.05).[Conclusion]Birthcanalpainlesslaborhasmoresignificantanalgesiceffectthanspontaneouslab7、or.Itcaneffectivelyimprovethequalityofchildbirthandhasgoodsafety,SOitisworthyofclinicalpopularizationandapplication.[Keywords]Parturition;Pain[中图分类号]R714.3[文献标识码]A[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671—7171.2014.05.035][文章编号]1671—7171{2014)05—0936,941—03足月产妇在分娩开始时,伴随规律宫缩会出现1资料和方法剧烈的疼痛,产妇8、容易出现焦虑、急躁的情绪,对于胎儿的娩出和整个产程的顺利进行产生很大的影1.1一般资料本院2012年8月至2013年8月响_1]。近几年随着围生医学的发展进步,在保
2、05);观察组分娩过程中第一产程、第二产程的时间均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(PdO.05);观察组分娩过程中的脉搏、心率、氧分压、二氧化碳分压均明显优于对照组,更接近于正常均值,且差异具有统计学意义(PdO.05)。【结论】产道无痛分娩相比自然分娩具有显著的镇痛作用,能更有效地提高分娩的质量,安全性更好,值得临床推广应用。[关键词]分娩;疼痛AnalysisoftheDifferenceBetweenBirthCanalPainlessLaborandSpontaneousLaborWfANGLi—xin.rEFeng(Delive
3、ryRoom,MaternalandChildHealthHospitalofChengdeCity,Hebei067000,China)[Abstract][Objective]Toanalyzethedifferencebetweenbirthcanalpainlesslaborandspontaneouslabor.[Methods]Totally400full—termpregnantwomeninourhospitalfromAug.2012tOAug.2013wereenrolledinthestudy.Accordingtoth
4、erandomnumbertable.allthesewomenweredividedintoobservationgroup(一200)andcontrolgroup(,2:200).Theobservationgroupwasgivenpainlesslabor,whilethecontrolgroupwasgivenspontaneouslabor.ClinicaldifferencebetweentWOmethodswasanalyzed.[Results]Thepainintheobservationgroupduringthech
5、ildbirthwasobviouslybetterthanthatinthecontrolgroup,andtherewassig—nificantdifference(PdO.05).Thetimeoffirstandsecondstageofchildbirthintheobservationgroupduringthechildbirthwereobviouslylowerthanthoseinthecontrolgroup,andtherewassignificantdifference(P<0.05).Pulse,heartrat
6、e,partialpressureofoxygenandcarbondioxideintheobservationgroupduringthechildbirthwereobviouslybetterthanthecontrolgroupandclosertOnormalmeanvalue,andtherewassignifi—cantdifference(PdO.05).[Conclusion]Birthcanalpainlesslaborhasmoresignificantanalgesiceffectthanspontaneouslab
7、or.Itcaneffectivelyimprovethequalityofchildbirthandhasgoodsafety,SOitisworthyofclinicalpopularizationandapplication.[Keywords]Parturition;Pain[中图分类号]R714.3[文献标识码]A[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671—7171.2014.05.035][文章编号]1671—7171{2014)05—0936,941—03足月产妇在分娩开始时,伴随规律宫缩会出现1资料和方法剧烈的疼痛,产妇
8、容易出现焦虑、急躁的情绪,对于胎儿的娩出和整个产程的顺利进行产生很大的影1.1一般资料本院2012年8月至2013年8月响_1]。近几年随着围生医学的发展进步,在保
此文档下载收益归作者所有