AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架

AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架

ID:41281560

大小:322.31 KB

页数:15页

时间:2019-08-21

AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架_第1页
AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架_第2页
AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架_第3页
AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架_第4页
AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架_第5页
资源描述:

《AFlexibleFramework:一个灵活的框架》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在教育资源-天天文库

1、AFlexibleFrameworkChapter7Section2KeyTermsEqualprotectionSegregationAffirmativeActionRoleoftheSupremecourtHasthefinalsayoverwhethergovernmentofficialsactedproperlyDecideifcertainactionsviolatetheConstitutionThecourttakesactioneitherlegalorillegalOverturningaD

2、ecisionDecisionnotalwayspermanentMaybeoverturnedbyachangedinamendmentsDreddScottwasoverturnedbythe13thamendmentNewideasmayleadtooverturninganolddecisionInterpretingPrincipleEqualprotection-meansthatpeoplemustbetreatedfairly,butitdoesnotmeanthateveryonemustbet

3、reatedexactlythesamewayHowhasthecourtsopinionchangedovertime?Exampleis14thamendmentandthe“EqualprotectionClause”Peoplemustbetreatedfairlybutdonothavetotreatedexactlythesame.Abankcanonlydenyaloanontheabilitytopayandnottheperson’sraceEqualityandSegregationPless

4、yvFerguson(1896)14thAmendmentgaveAfricanAmericanscitizenshipHoweverstatespassedlawsseparatingblacksandwhitesSegregation-orseparationofblacksandwhitesinpublicplaces.(cars,trains,restaurants)HomerPlessyrefusedtoleavethe“allwhitecar”PlessyarguedthatLouisianaviol

5、atedhis14thAmendmentSupremeCourtruledsaidaslongasthecarswereofequalqualitytherewasnoviolationFor50yearsthisdecisionwasknownasSeparatebutEqualNoteveryoneagreedwithSeparatebutEqualBythe1950”smanyAmericanswerequestioningthisrulingThurgoodMarshallalawyerfortheNAA

6、CPbroughtcasesbeforethecourtsregardingthisissue.BrownvtheBoardofEducationLindaBrownlived7blocksfromawhiteschoolShewasrequiretoattendanAfricanAmericanschool21blocksawayLinda’sparentsthoughtsheshouldbeabletoattendtheallwhiteschoolThurgoodMarshallarguedthatblack

7、childrenfeltinferiorAlljusticeswereconvincedofMarshall’sreasoningStatedthatsegregationdoesmakepeoplefeelinferiorSeparatebutequalhadnoplaceinpubliceducationThisshowshowtheSupremeCourtcanbeflexibleEqualityandAffirmativeAction1960’scongresspassedaseriesoflawskno

8、wastheCivilRightslaws.WouldtryandundoyearsofdiscriminationAffirmativeAction-stepstocounteracttheeffectsofpastracialdiscriminationanddiscriminationagainstwomenSomepeoplearguethataffirmativ

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。