ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION

ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION

ID:41101084

大小:143.16 KB

页数:22页

时间:2019-08-16

ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION_第1页
ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION_第2页
ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION_第3页
ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION_第4页
ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION_第5页
资源描述:

《ACCEPTANCE, FAIRNESS, AND POLITICAL OBLIGATION》由会员上传分享,免费在线阅读,更多相关内容在学术论文-天天文库

1、LegalTheory,18(2012),209229.cCambridgeUniversityPress20120361-6843/12$15.00+00doi:10.1017/S1352325212000067ACCEPTANCE,FAIRNESS,ANDPOLITICALOBLIGATIONEdwardSong*LouisianaStateUniversityAmongthemostpopularstrategiesforjustifyingpoliticalobligationsarethosethatappealtotheprincipl

2、eoffairness.Thesetheoriesfacethechallenge,canonicallyarticulatedbyRobertNozick,ofexplaininghowitisthatpersonsareobligatedtoschemeswhentheyreceivegoodsthattheydonotaskforbutcannotreject.JohnSimmonsoffersonedefenseoftheprincipleoffairness,arguingthatpeoplecouldbeboundbyobligation

3、soffairnessiftheyvoluntarilyacceptgoodsproducedbyacooperativescheme.Simmons,however,thinksthatsuchatheorywilldolittleworkinjustifyingpoliticalobligations,sincevirtuallynoonevoluntarilyacceptsstategoods.Thispaperattemptstoadvancejustsuchatheorybyarguingthatstatesareinfactgenuine

4、cooperativeschemesandthatSimmonsisoverlypessimisticinhisappraisalofwhetherthemajorityofcitizensacceptthegoodsprovidedbytheirstates.Theproblemofpoliticalobligationwhetherornotcitizensareobligatedtosupportandobeythelawsoftheirstateisamongthemostvenerableofphilosophicalpuzzlesandr

5、emainsacentralproblemwithincontemporarylegalandpoliticalphilosophy.Atissuehereisnotwhethercitizenssome-timeshavegoodreasonsoraremorallyobligatedtoobeythelaw,forthelawoftenplaceslegalrequirementsonpeopletodowhatisalreadymorallyrequired.Thequestioniswhethertheyhaveadutytoobeythel

6、awjustbecauseitisalaw,atleastuptoapoint.1Despiteageneralintuitionthatcitizensareinfactsoobligated,ithasremaineddifficulttoexplainwhythis∗IamverygratefulforthecommentsandassistanceofIanCruise,KoryDeClark,AnnetteDenton,DavidLefkowitz,JustinTosi,andananonymousreviewerforLEGALTHEORY

7、.1.Morespecifically,asWilliamEdmundsonsuggests,followingMichaelKramer,thedebateoverpoliticalobligationconcernswhetherornotthereareprimafacie,comprehensivelyapplicable,universallyborne,andcontent-independent,generalobligationstoobeyasocietyslegalnorms.Suchobligationsareprimafacie

8、inthesensethatthedutyisnotabsolutebutdefeasiblebyother

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。